Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650543›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Implementation of Delayed Cord Clamping in public health facilities: a case study from India.

Archana Chowdhury, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi, Ved Prakash, Nilam Patel, Kunal Pawar, Vinay Kumar Koparde, Anupriya Shukla, Sangeeta Karmakar, Smitha Chekanath Parambath, Sarah Rowe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Factors associated with rates and durations of cord clamping practice compliance in preterm neonates of <33 weeks' gestation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Archana Chowdhury *Nutrition International, Delhi, India. drarchanam@gmail.com.
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi *International Institute of Health Management and Research (IIHMR)-Delhi, Delhi, India.
Ved PrakashGovernment of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nilam PatelGovernment of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Kunal PawarNutrition International, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Vinay Kumar KopardeNutrition International, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anupriya ShuklaNutrition International, India, Delhi, India.
Sangeeta KarmakarNutrition International, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Smitha Chekanath ParambathNutrition International, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
Sarah RoweNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.
Homero MartinezNutrition International, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal and country specific recommendations on Delayed umbilical cord clamping (DCC) are available, though guidance on their implementation in program settings is lacking. In India, DCC (clamping not earlier than 1 min after birth) is a component in the package of services delivered as part of the India Newborn Action Plan (INAP) supported by Nutrition International (NI) in two states. The objective of this case study was to document the learnings from implementation of DCC in these two states and to understand the health system factors that affected its operationalization.

methodsMixed methods were followed. Using the World Health Organization (WHO) Health Systems building blocks as a framework, 20 Key-Informant Interviews were conducted to explore facilitators and barriers to routine implementation of DCC in public health settings. Existing quantitative program data and secondary data from labour-room registers from eight NI- supported districts were analysed to assess the prevalence of DCC implementation in public health systems settings.

resultsA demonstrated commitment from the government to implement DCC at all delivery points in NI supported districts was observed. Funds were sufficient, trainings were optimal, knowledge of the health workforce was adequate and a recording mechanism was in place. According to record reviews, DCC was more likely to happen in facilities that provide Basic Emergency Obstetric services and among normal deliveries. It was less likely to be followed in babies delivered by Caesarean section (OR 0.03; 95%CI 0.02,0.05), birthweight < 2000 g (OR 0.22; 95%CI 0.12,0.47), multiple pregnancies (OR 0.17, 95%CI 0.05,0.63), birth asphyxia requiring resuscitation (0.37; 95%CI 0.26,0.52), and those delivered during day shift (OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.40, 0.83).

conclusionsWide coverage of DCC in public health settings in the two states was observed. Good governance, adequate funding, commitment of health workforce has likely contributed to its success in these contexts. These are critical elements to guide DCC implementation in India and for consideration in other settings.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionUmbilical CordConstrictionFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyUmbilical Cord ClampingDelayed cord clampingHealth facilitiesHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID35650543
PMCPMC9158298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.