Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650458›Full record

ReviewNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2022

Gepants - a long way to cure: a narrative review.

Claudia Altamura, Nicoletta Brunelli, Marilena Marcosano, Luisa Fofi, Fabrizio Vernieri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cannabinoids rescue migraine symptoms caused by central CGRP administration in mice.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Update on gepants for the treatment of chronic migraine.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Migraine Comorbidities.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Brief Review of Gepants.Current pain and headache reports · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claudia AltamuraHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, 00128, Rome, Italy. c.altamura@policlinicocampus.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5934-5535
Nicoletta BrunelliHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8590-9015
Marilena MarcosanoHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Luisa FofiHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, 00128, Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio VernieriHeadache and Neurosonology Unit, Neurology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, 00128, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-9336
Campus Bio Medico University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is probably the most potent vasodilator in cerebral circulation. Forty years after its discovery, the new CGRP-targeted therapy monoclonal antibodies, and the small molecule gepants, are now available for clinical practice. While randomized controlled trials and real-world experience consistently demonstrated the high efficacy and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies, limited evidence is available to characterize gepants fully. Depending on pharmacokinetics, these CGRP receptor antagonists can be used for acute (ubrogepant, rimegepant, and the not yet approved zavegepant) or preventive (atogepant and rimegepant) migraine treatment. Randomized placebo-controlled trials demonstrated gepants efficacy in treating acute attacks to obtain 2 h pain freedom in about 20% of patients and pain relief in about 60%, while up to 60% of treated patients with episodic migraine may experience a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days. The most common treatment-related emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea, constipation) for the acute or preventive use. No vascular or hepatic concerns have emerged so far. More studies are ongoing to investigate gepant tolerability and safety also if associated with monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP and other therapeutic classes. Gepants are also under investigation to treat other painful and non-painful conditions. Real-life studies are necessary to confirm the trials' findings and investigate more practical clinical aspects.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAntibodies, MonoclonalCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideHumansPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpiro CompoundsAntibodies, MonoclonalatogepantCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesSpiro CompoundsCalcitonin gene-related peptideGepantsMigraine treatmentReal world

Identifiers

PMID35650458
PMCPMC9159895
OpenAlexW4281688121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.