Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650433›Full record

ArticleNature2022

Communicating doctors' consensus persistently increases COVID-19 vaccinations.

Vojtěch Bartoš, Michal Bauer, Jana Cahlíková, Julie Chytilová

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Social Psychological Perspectives on Political Polarization: Insights and Implications for Climate Change.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Political polarization and health.Nature medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vojtěch BartošDepartment of Economics, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. vojtech.bartos@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1638-5983
Michal BauerCERGE-EI, a joint workplace of Charles University and the Economics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8414-5447
Jana CahlíkováDepartment of Public Economics, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5757-6145
Julie ChytilováCERGE-EI, a joint workplace of Charles University and the Economics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8474-8192
Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education – Economics Institute · CZEni (Italy) · ITMax Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance · DE

Funding

European Research Council 101002898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reluctance of people to get vaccinated represents a fundamental challenge to containing the spread of deadly infectious diseases

Indexed as

ConsensusCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysiciansVaccinationCzech RepublicHealth BehaviorHumansPublic HealthPublic OpinionSocieties, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTrustVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35650433
PMCPMC9200639
OpenAlexW4281737302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.