ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2023
Efficacy of ultrasound-guided greater occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic refractory migraine.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal Outcomes of Bilateral and Unilateral Proximal Greater Occipital Nerve Pulsed Radiofrequency in Migraine: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of distal versus proximal greater occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency in migraine management: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of combining greater occipital nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with chronic migraine: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Head & face medicine · 2024Trial
- Comparison of the efficacy of repeated greater occipital nerve block and pulsed radiofrequency therapy in chronic migraine patients: a randomized controlled study.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2024Trial
- A new neuromodulation method in chronic migraine; non-ınvasive pulsed radiofrequency, a single-blinded, randomised, controlled trial.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Trial
- Long-term efficacy and predictors of response to greater occipital nerve pulsed radiofrequency in migraine with prior preventive treatment failure.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- A comparison of the efficacy of bilateral and unilateral pulsed radiofrequency treatments in the management of chronic migraine.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-guided continuous radiofrequency ablation of the proximal greater occipital nerve is effective in refractory occipital neuralgia: a retrospective cohort study.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2025Article
- Efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency stimulation in patients with chronic pain: a narrative review.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An anatomical analysis of the occipital nerve complex: an essential tool for the application of occipital nerve blocks.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation of the Greater Occipital Nerve for the Treatment of Headache Disorders in Adults: A Systematic Review.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-Guided Combined Greater Occipital Nerve Block at the C2 Level with Trapezius Trigger Point Injection and Supraorbital-Supratrochlear Nerve Block: More Effective on Allodynia and Disability in Chronic Migraine.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveUltrasound (US) guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) therapy can be used on the greater occipital nerve (GON) in patients with chronic migraine (CM) who are unresponsive to conservative treatments. We aimed to demonstrate the change in pain intensity, duration of migraine episodes, frequency of attacks, migraine disability, depression, and sleep disturbance scores before and after treatment in patients with CM who underwent US-guided GON PRF and the effectiveness of treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsAccording to the International Classification of Headache Disorders III beta version diagnostic criteria, 25 of 43 patients with CM whom treated with GON PRF were included in the study. The Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and a visual analog scale (VAS) were used on patients before GON PRF treatment and at post treatment months 1 and 3.
resultsThe median duration and number of migraine episodes in the post-interventional 1st month and 3rd month were significantly shorter and fewer compared with the pre-intervention period (p < 0.001). In the comparison with the pre-intervention values, all of the scoring concepts, namely the MIDAS, VAS, BDI, and PSQI, revealed a significant drop in the postintervention 1st and 3rd month (p < 0.001).
conclusionIn this study, we observed that US-guided GON PRF therapy applied at the proximal (C2) level was a safe and effective treatment option. With GON PRF, we observed a decrease in pain intensity, pain frequency, and duration of episodes, and an improvement in depression symptoms, migraine disability, and sleep disorder scores accompanying chronic migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.