ArticleBehavior research methods2023
The project implicit international dataset: Measuring implicit and explicit social group attitudes and stereotypes across 34 countries (2009-2019).
Article in Behavior research methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Strategies for mitigating artificial intelligence bias in healthcare: a systematic review.JAMIA open · 2026Review
- Structural Cissexism, Mental Health, and Unmet Health Care Needs Among Gender-Diverse Adolescents in the United States.American journal of public health · 2026Article
- Perceptual exposure influences body size perceptions and anti-fat attitudes.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Neuroscientific Analysis of Logo Design: Implications for Luxury Brand Marketing.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Impact of Novel Medications for Obesity on Weight Stigma and Societal Attitudes: A Narrative Review.Current obesity reports · 2025Review
- Who is American? A comprehensive analysis of the American = White/Foreign = Asian stereotype (2007-2023).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- ChatGPT as Research Scientist: Probing GPT's capabilities as a Research Librarian, Research Ethicist, Data Generator, and Data Predictor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Structural transphobia is associated with psychological distress and suicidality in a large national sample of transgender adults.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2024Article
- Awareness of implicit attitudes: Large-scale investigations of mechanism and scope.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2023Article
- Implicit and explicit racial prejudice and stereotyping toward Black (vs. White) Americans: The prevalence and variation among genetic counselors in North America.Journal of genetic counseling · 2023Article
- Cultural variation in age perceptions and developmental transitions.Frontiers in social psychology · 2023Article
- Community-level age bias and older adult mortality.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2023Article
- Bias among managers: Its prevalence across a decade and comparison across occupations.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, researchers across the social sciences have sought to document and explain the worldwide variation in social group attitudes (evaluative representations, e.g., young-good/old-bad) and stereotypes (attribute representations, e.g., male-science/female-arts). Indeed, uncovering such country-level variation can provide key insights into questions ranging from how attitudes and stereotypes are clustered across places to why places vary in attitudes and stereotypes (including ecological and social correlates). Here, we introduce the Project Implicit:International (PI:International) dataset that has the potential to propel such research by offering the first cross-country dataset of both implicit (indirectly measured) and explicit (directly measured) attitudes and stereotypes across multiple topics and years. PI:International comprises 2.3 million tests for seven topics (race, sexual orientation, age, body weight, nationality, and skin-tone attitudes, as well as men/women-science/arts stereotypes) using both indirect (Implicit Association Test; IAT) and direct (self-report) measures collected continuously from 2009 to 2019 from 34 countries in each country's native language(s). We show that the IAT data from PI:International have adequate internal consistency (split-half reliability), convergent validity (implicit-explicit correlations), and known groups validity. Given such reliability and validity, we summarize basic descriptive statistics on the overall strength and variability of implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes around the world. The PI:International dataset, including both summary data and trial-level data from the IAT, is provided openly to facilitate wide access and novel discoveries on the global nature of implicit and explicit attitudes and stereotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.