Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650353›Full record

ReviewNature2022

The road to fully programmable protein catalysis.

Sarah L Lovelock, Rebecca Crawshaw, Sophie Basler, Colin Levy, David Baker, Donald Hilvert, Anthony P Green

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Next-Generation Manufacturing: The Evolving Role of Biocatalysis in AstraZeneca.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Reprogramming NAD(P)Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Zero-shot design of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Exploring PadR Proteins for Artificial Enzyme Design.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah L LovelockManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-3189
Rebecca CrawshawManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sophie BaslerLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4594-2670
Colin LevyManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David BakerDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. dabaker@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7896-6217
Donald HilvertLaboratory of Organic Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. donald.hilvert@org.chem.ethz.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3941-621X
Anthony P GreenManchester Institute of Biotechnology, School of Chemistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. anthony.green@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0454-1798

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M027023/1European Research CouncilHoward Hughes Medical InstituteMedical Research Council MR/T041722/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to design efficient enzymes from scratch would have a profound effect on chemistry, biotechnology and medicine. Rapid progress in protein engineering over the past decade makes us optimistic that this ambition is within reach. The development of artificial enzymes containing metal cofactors and noncanonical organocatalytic groups shows how protein structure can be optimized to harness the reactivity of nonproteinogenic elements. In parallel, computational methods have been used to design protein catalysts for diverse reactions on the basis of fundamental principles of transition state stabilization. Although the activities of designed catalysts have been quite low, extensive laboratory evolution has been used to generate efficient enzymes. Structural analysis of these systems has revealed the high degree of precision that will be needed to design catalysts with greater activity. To this end, emerging protein design methods, including deep learning, hold particular promise for improving model accuracy. Here we take stock of key developments in the field and highlight new opportunities for innovation that should allow us to transition beyond the current state of the art and enable the robust design of biocatalysts to address societal needs.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisBiotechnologyProtein EngineeringProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.