Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650209›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Reticulate evolution in the Pteris fauriei group (Pteridaceae).

Yi-Shan Chao, Atsushi Ebihara, Wen-Liang Chiou, Jer-Min Tsai, Yu-Wen Huang, Tom A Ranker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi-Shan ChaoDepartment of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan. pteridaceae@gmail.com.
Atsushi EbiharaDepartment of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4-1-1, Amakubo, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, 305-0005, Japan.
Wen-Liang ChiouTaiwan Forestry Research Institute, 53 Nan-Hai Rd., Taipei, 100051, Taiwan.
Jer-Min TsaiDepartment of Information and Communication, Kun Shan University, 195, Kunda Rd., Tainan, 710303, Taiwan.
Yu-Wen HuangDepartment of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, Kaohsiung Medical University, 100, Shih-Chuan 1st Rd., Kaohsiung, 80708, Taiwan.
Tom A RankerUniversity of Hawai'i at Mānoa, School of Life Sciences, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pteris fauriei group (Pteridaceae) has a wide distribution in Eastern Asia and includes 18 species with similar but varied morphology. We collected more than 300 specimens of the P. fauriei group and determined ploidy by flow cytometry and inferred phylogenies by molecular analyses of chloroplast and nuclear DNA markers. Our results reveal a complicated reticulate evolution, consisting of seven parental taxa and 58 hybrids. The large number of hybrid taxa have added significant morphological complexity to the group leading to difficult taxonomic issues. The hybrids generally had broader ranges and more populations than their parental taxa. Genetic combination of different pairs of parental species created divergent phenotypes of hybrids, exhibited by both morphological characteristics and ecological fidelities. Niche novelty could facilitate hybrid speciation. Apogamy is common in this group and potentially contributes to the sustainability of the whole group. We propose that frequent hybridizations among members of the P. fauriei group generate and maintain genetic diversity, via novel genetic combinations, niche differentiation, and apogamy.

Indexed as

PteridaceaePterisGenetic VariationHybridization, GeneticPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35650209
PMCPMC9159987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.