Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650207›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Cryo-EM structures of Gid12-bound GID E3 reveal steric blockade as a mechanism inhibiting substrate ubiquitylation.

Shuai Qiao, Chia-Wei Lee, Dawafuti Sherpa, Jakub Chrustowicz, Jingdong Cheng, Maximilian Duennebacke, Barbara Steigenberger, Ozge Karayel, Duc Tung Vu, Susanne von Gronau and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The many faces of the GID/CTLH E3 ligase complex.Biochemical Society transactions · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. The hGIDLife science alliance · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. N-degron pathways.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shuai QiaoDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9573-8774
Chia-Wei Lee *Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8925-7421
Dawafuti Sherpa *Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7815-5895
Jakub Chrustowicz *Department of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3059-1863
Jingdong ChengInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Medical Epigenetics, International Co-laboratory of Medical Epigenetics and Metabolism, University of Fudan, 200032, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4442-377X
Maximilian DuennebackeDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Barbara SteigenbergerMass Spectrometry Core Facility, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Ozge KarayelDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2541-1159
Duc Tung VuDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Susanne von GronauDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Matthias MannDepartment of Proteomics and Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1292-4799
Florian WilflingDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6559-7261
Brenda A SchulmanDepartment of Molecular Machines and Signaling, Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. schulman@biochem.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-3083-1126
Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry · DEHarvard University · USMax Planck Institute of Biophysics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein degradation, a major eukaryotic response to cellular signals, is subject to numerous layers of regulation. In yeast, the evolutionarily conserved GID E3 ligase mediates glucose-induced degradation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (Fbp1), malate dehydrogenase (Mdh2), and other gluconeogenic enzymes. "GID" is a collection of E3 ligase complexes; a core scaffold, RING-type catalytic core, and a supramolecular assembly module together with interchangeable substrate receptors select targets for ubiquitylation. However, knowledge of additional cellular factors directly regulating GID-type E3s remains rudimentary. Here, we structurally and biochemically characterize Gid12 as a modulator of the GID E3 ligase complex. Our collection of cryo-EM reconstructions shows that Gid12 forms an extensive interface sealing the substrate receptor Gid4 onto the scaffold, and remodeling the degron binding site. Gid12 also sterically blocks a recruited Fbp1 or Mdh2 from the ubiquitylation active sites. Our analysis of the role of Gid12 establishes principles that may more generally underlie E3 ligase regulation.

Indexed as

Saccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCryoelectron MicroscopyGluconeogenesisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeUbiquitinationSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID35650207
PMCPMC9160049
OpenAlexW4281835831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.