Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35650191›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

A calcium-based plasticity model for predicting long-term potentiation and depression in the neocortex.

Giuseppe Chindemi, Marwan Abdellah, Oren Amsalem, Ruth Benavides-Piccione, Vincent Delattre, Michael Doron, András Ecker, Aurélien T Jaquier, James King, Pramod Kumbhar and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Giuseppe ChindemiBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland. giuseppe.chindemi@unige.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6872-2366
Marwan AbdellahBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Oren AmsalemDepartment of Neurobiology, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8070-0378
Ruth Benavides-PiccioneInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
Vincent DelattreLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Michael DoronEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
András EckerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9635-4169
Aurélien T JaquierBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
James KingBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0906-8389
Pramod KumbharBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-801X
Caitlin MonneyBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rodrigo PerinLaboratory of Neural Microcircuitry, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5756-3769
Christian RössertBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anil M TuncelBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0317-2556
Werner Van GeitBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2915-720X
Javier DeFelipeInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-0660
Michael GraupnerUniversité de Paris, SPPIN - Saints-Pères Paris Institute for the Neurosciences, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1197-2388
Idan SegevDepartment of Neurobiology, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Henry MarkramBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland.
Eilif B MullerBlue Brain Project, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland. eilif.muller@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4309-8266
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CHConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyramidal cells (PCs) form the backbone of the layered structure of the neocortex, and plasticity of their synapses is thought to underlie learning in the brain. However, such long-term synaptic changes have been experimentally characterized between only a few types of PCs, posing a significant barrier for studying neocortical learning mechanisms. Here we introduce a model of synaptic plasticity based on data-constrained postsynaptic calcium dynamics, and show in a neocortical microcircuit model that a single parameter set is sufficient to unify the available experimental findings on long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of PC connections. In particular, we find that the diverse plasticity outcomes across the different PC types can be explained by cell-type-specific synaptic physiology, cell morphology and innervation patterns, without requiring type-specific plasticity. Generalizing the model to in vivo extracellular calcium concentrations, we predict qualitatively different plasticity dynamics from those observed in vitro. This work provides a first comprehensive null model for LTP/LTD between neocortical PC types in vivo, and an open framework for further developing models of cortical synaptic plasticity.

Indexed as

Long-Term PotentiationNeocortexCalciumDepressionNeuronal PlasticityCalcium

Identifiers

PMID35650191
PMCPMC9160074
OpenAlexW4281640213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.