Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35649943›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Methods for the calibration of bone conduction transducers at frequencies from 5 to 20 kHz.

Aaron K Remenschneider, Jeffrey Tao Cheng, John J Rosowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Contemporary Mechanics of Conductive Hearing Loss.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aaron K RemenschneiderDepartment of Otolaryngology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
Jeffrey Tao ChengDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
John J RosowskiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

Funding

Mechanisms of Conductive Presbycusis in HumansK08DC018575 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI REMENSCHNEIDER, AARON KYLE · 2020 to 2024
$950k
NIDCD NIH HHS K08 DC018575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Techniques for standardizing the output of bone conduction transducers over the 5-20 kHz range are presented. The techniques include definitions of the standard artificial mastoid (AM) impedance and force sensitivity in that high-frequency range using an impedance head coupled to a vibration source. The AM impedance is shown to vary with the contact area of the vibration source. The AM force sensitivity does not vary with the contact area but does exhibit sharp frequency dependences over the 14-20 kHz range. The sharp frequency dependence complicates the use of the AM force sensor as a stand-alone calibration device at these high frequencies. An alternative calibration scheme that uses an accelerometer interposed between the vibrator and the AM impedance is described. Comparisons of the two schemes demonstrate that the accelerometer method produces more consistent results. Comparisons of the force and acceleration output of one bone conduction vibrator at high frequencies suggest those outputs depend on the driven load. The loads used in the two calibration schemes are compared to what is known of the impedance of the skin-covered head.

Indexed as

Bone ConductionTransducersCalibrationMastoidVibration

Identifiers

PMID35649943
PMCPMC9064400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.