ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Methods for the calibration of bone conduction transducers at frequencies from 5 to 20 kHz.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary Mechanics of Conductive Hearing Loss.Operative techniques in otolaryngology--head and neck surgery · 2024Article
- Characterization and Clinical Use of Bone Conduction Transducers at Extended High Frequencies.Hearing research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Techniques for standardizing the output of bone conduction transducers over the 5-20 kHz range are presented. The techniques include definitions of the standard artificial mastoid (AM) impedance and force sensitivity in that high-frequency range using an impedance head coupled to a vibration source. The AM impedance is shown to vary with the contact area of the vibration source. The AM force sensitivity does not vary with the contact area but does exhibit sharp frequency dependences over the 14-20 kHz range. The sharp frequency dependence complicates the use of the AM force sensor as a stand-alone calibration device at these high frequencies. An alternative calibration scheme that uses an accelerometer interposed between the vibrator and the AM impedance is described. Comparisons of the two schemes demonstrate that the accelerometer method produces more consistent results. Comparisons of the force and acceleration output of one bone conduction vibrator at high frequencies suggest those outputs depend on the driven load. The loads used in the two calibration schemes are compared to what is known of the impedance of the skin-covered head.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.