Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35649937›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022

Inadequate pitch-difference sensitivity prevents half of all listeners from discriminating major vs minor tone sequences.

Joselyn Ho, Daniel S Mann, Gregory Hickok, Charles Chubb

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joselyn HoDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92617, USA.
Daniel S MannDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92617, USA.
Gregory HickokDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92617, USA.
Charles ChubbDepartment of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92617, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2700-8056
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

NIDCD T32 Interdisciplinary Training Program in Hearing ResearchT32DC010775 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI Karina S Cramer, Raju Metherate · 2010 to 2026
$3.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC010775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substantial evidence suggests that sensitivity to the difference between the major vs minor musical scales may be bimodally distributed. Much of this evidence comes from experiments using the "3-task." On each trial in the 3-task, the listener hears a rapid, random sequence of tones containing equal numbers of notes of either a G major or G minor triad and strives (with feedback) to judge which type of "tone-scramble" it was. This study asks whether the bimodal distribution in 3-task performance is due to variation (across listeners) in sensitivity to differences in pitch. On each trial in a "pitch-difference task," the listener hears two tones and judges whether the second tone is higher or lower than the first. When the first tone is roved (rather than fixed throughout the task), performance varies dramatically across listeners with median threshold approximately equal to a quarter-tone. Strikingly, nearly all listeners with thresholds higher than a quarter-tone performed near chance in the 3-task. Across listeners with thresholds below a quarter-tone, 3-task performance was uniformly distributed from chance to ceiling; thus, the large, lower mode of the distribution in 3-task performance is produced mainly by listeners with roved pitch-difference thresholds greater than a quarter-tone.

Indexed as

MusicDifferential ThresholdHearingTask Performance and Analysis

Identifiers

PMID35649937
PMCPMC9098252
OpenAlexW4280591345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.