Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35649605›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of frailty in primary care: a rapid realist review.

Khulud Alharbi, Thomas Blakeman, Harm van Marwijk, David Reeves, Jung Yin Tsang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Rethinking Health System Readiness for Frailty Management: Frontline Perspectives from Indonesia and Malaysia.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Brief Geriatric Assessment (BGA):Saudi medical journal · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khulud AlharbiDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK khulud.alharbi@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-7880
Thomas BlakemanDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Harm van MarwijkDivision of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Brighton, Falmer, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6206-485X
David ReevesDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6377-6859
Jung Yin TsangDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying and managing the needs of frail people in the community is an increasing priority for policy makers. We sought to identify factors that enable or constrain the implementation of interventions for frail older persons in primary care.

designA rapid realist review. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, SCOPUS and EMBASE, and grey literature. The search was conducted in September 2019 and rerun on 8 January 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: We considered all types of empirical studies describing interventions targeting frailty in primary care. ANALYSIS: We followed the Realist and Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards quality and publication criteria for our synthesis to systematically analyse and synthesise the existing literature and to identify (intervention-context-mechanism-outcome) configurations. We used normalisation processes theory to illuminate mechanisms surrounding implementation.

resultsOur primary research returned 1755 articles, narrowed down to 29 relevant frailty intervention studies conducted in primary care. Our review identified two families of interventions. They comprised: (1) interventions aimed at the comprehensive assessment and management of frailty needs; and (2) interventions targeting specific frailty needs. Key factors that facilitate or inhibit the translation of frailty interventions into practice related to the distribution of resources; patient engagement and professional skill sets to address identified need.

conclusionThere remain challenges to achieving successful implementation of frailty interventions in primary care. There were a key learning points under each family. First, targeted allocation of resources to address specific needs allows a greater alignment of skill sets and reduces overassessment of frail individuals. Second, earlier patient involvement may also improve intervention implementation and adherence. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The published protocol for the review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019161193).

Indexed as

FrailtyAdministrative PersonnelAgedAged, 80 and overHumansPalliative CarePrimary Health Carefrailtygeneral practitionersinterventionsolder peopletools

Identifiers

PMID35649605
PMCPMC9161080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.