Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35649121›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology2022

Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation.

Brian Howard, David E Haines, Atul Verma, Nicole Kirchhof, Noah Barka, Birce Onal, Mark T Stewart, Daniel C Sigg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulsed field ablation for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation: a scientific statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society, and the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Indirect treatment comparison of two pulsed field ablation systems for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. First-in-human clinical series of a novel conformable large-lattice pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A single centre experience of pulsed field ablation for atrial fibrillation using the Medtronic PulseSelect System: an analysis of the first 100 patients.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Pulsed field ablation: focused on atrial fibrillation ablation.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Latest Advances and Ongoing Challenges in Pulsed Field Ablation.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Brian HowardMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).
David E HainesBeaumont, Royal Oaks, MI (D.E.H.).
Atul VermaMcGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (A.V.).ORCID 0000-0002-1020-9727
Nicole KirchhofMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-5748-0813
Noah BarkaMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-3870-0937
Birce OnalMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0001-8961-8939
Mark T StewartMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0003-1717-195X
Daniel C SiggMedtronic, Minneapolis, MN (B.H., N.K., N.B., B.O., M.T.S., D.C.S.).ORCID 0000-0002-9556-0849
Medtronic (Ireland) · IEBeaumont Health · USMcGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhrenic nerve palsy is a well-known complication of cardiac ablation, resulting from the application of direct thermal energy. Emerging pulsed field ablation (PFA) may reduce the risk of phrenic nerve injury but has not been well characterized.

methodsAccelerometers and continuous pacing were used during PFA deliveries in a porcine model. Acute dose response was established in a first experimental phase with ascending PFA intensity delivered to the phrenic nerve (n=12). In a second phase, nerves were targeted with a single ablation level to observe the effect of repetitive ablations on nerve function (n=4). A third chronic phase characterized assessed histopathology of nerves adjacent to ablated cardiac tissue (n=6).

resultsAcutely, we observed a dose-dependent response in phrenic nerve function including reversible stunning (R

conclusionsProximity of the catheter to the phrenic nerve and the PFA dose level were critical for phrenic nerve response. Gross and histopathologic evaluation of phrenic nerves and diaphragms at a chronic time point yielded no injury. These results provide a basis for understanding the susceptibility and recovery of phrenic nerves in response to PFA and a need for appropriate caution in moving beyond animal models.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationCatheter AblationPeripheral Nerve InjuriesPulmonary VeinsAnimalsPhrenic NerveSwineVena Cava, Superioranimalscatheterdiaphragmelectroporationphrenic nerve

Identifiers

PMID35649121
PMCPMC9213085
OpenAlexW4282007469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.