Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35649110›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2022

Ex-vivo lung perfusion therapies: do they add value to organ donation?

Amit Lyengar, Alexis Schiazza, Edward Cantu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amit LyengarDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alexis SchiazzaVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.
Edward CantuDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

Objective Lung Assessment Tools for Improved Organ Use in Lung TransplantationR01HL155821 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CANTU, EDWARD · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewSignificant limitations in organ availability and postoperative graft dysfunction plague lung transplantation and there is continual need for innovation. Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has emerged over the last decade as an alternative and/or complementary allograft storage and assessment tool, however logistical hurdles have limited its widespread dissemination. As such, the overall current and potential value of EVLP on modern-day lung transplantation should be considered as innovation moves forward. RECENT

findingsSince inception, EVLP has made important safety strides in conclusively showing noninferiority to cold storage in several trials. Recent advances have highlighted potential mechanisms by which EVLP in its current form may reduce the pathogenic origins of primary graft dysfunction. Exciting work on organ reconditioning with EVLP via reduction in intermediaries of acute inflammation and oxidative stress have been performed in animal models. In addition, cross-circulation during EVLP has emerged as a method to achieve more prolonged ex situ storage. The impending translation of these to clinical use will markedly improve the overall value of EVLP. SUMMARY: This review will highlight the current status of EVLP as it pertains to overall value in lung transplantation, focusing on historical and recent preclinical work and how innovation therein will improve lung transplantation as a field.

Indexed as

Lung TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAnimalsExtracorporeal CirculationHumansLungPerfusion

Identifiers

PMID35649110
PMCPMC9160442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.