ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2022
Ex-vivo lung perfusion therapies: do they add value to organ donation?
Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of perfusion parameters affecting weight gain in ex vivo perfusion.Artificial organs · 2025Pooled it
- MetaboSense: An Integrated Quantum Dot-Mediated Aptamer Assay and Modular Microfluidic Platform for Continuous In-Line Monitoring of Lung Metabolism During Ex Vivo Perfusion.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Platelet Activation on Lung Function During Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion, Lung Transplantation, and the Role of Antiplatelet Therapy: A Narrative Review.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- A multicenter analysis of lung transplantation outcomes comparing donation after circulatory death and donation after brain death.JHLT open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewSignificant limitations in organ availability and postoperative graft dysfunction plague lung transplantation and there is continual need for innovation. Ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has emerged over the last decade as an alternative and/or complementary allograft storage and assessment tool, however logistical hurdles have limited its widespread dissemination. As such, the overall current and potential value of EVLP on modern-day lung transplantation should be considered as innovation moves forward. RECENT
findingsSince inception, EVLP has made important safety strides in conclusively showing noninferiority to cold storage in several trials. Recent advances have highlighted potential mechanisms by which EVLP in its current form may reduce the pathogenic origins of primary graft dysfunction. Exciting work on organ reconditioning with EVLP via reduction in intermediaries of acute inflammation and oxidative stress have been performed in animal models. In addition, cross-circulation during EVLP has emerged as a method to achieve more prolonged ex situ storage. The impending translation of these to clinical use will markedly improve the overall value of EVLP. SUMMARY: This review will highlight the current status of EVLP as it pertains to overall value in lung transplantation, focusing on historical and recent preclinical work and how innovation therein will improve lung transplantation as a field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.