Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648985›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2022

Standard reference and percentiles of maximum respiratory pressures values of healthy children aged 7-10 years.

Camila Isabel Santos Schivinski, Renata Maba Gonçalves Wamosy, Paloma Lopes Francisco Parazzi, André Moreno Morcillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camila Isabel Santos SchivinskiUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6139-9727
Renata Maba Gonçalves WamosyUniversidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5772-9650
Paloma Lopes Francisco ParazziUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-603X
André Moreno MorcilloUniversidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2088-972X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to present standard reference for values of maximum respiratory pressures of healthy schoolchildren, according to gender.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study involving healthy children aged 7-10 years. Data of body mass and height were evaluated to calculate body mass index (BMI). In addition, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and maximal expiratory pressure values were evaluated according to the American Thoracic Society. The maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and data of maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) obtained in the study showed normal distribution and curves were built by the Lambda-Mu-Sigma (LMS) method, as well as the values of MIP and MEP percentiles 3, 10, 25, 50, 75, 90, and 97 for each gender.

resultsMIP and MEP data were collected from 399 schoolchildren. All schoolchildren in the sample had adequate FEV1 and BMI. The study showed an increase in respiratory pressure values with age progression. The MIP and MEP values of girls were of 53.4±11.0 and 61.8±12.5cmH2O, respectively, and those of boys were 59.9±13.6 and 69.6±15.7cmH2O, respectively.

conclusionsNormal curves and percentiles were developed for MIP and MEP values of healthy schoolchildren. The extreme percentiles (3rd and 97th) were determined, and a specific graph was elaborated for each group. These graphs may help clinical follow-up and therapeutic monitoring of different pediatric populations.

Indexed as

Maximal Respiratory PressuresRespiratory MusclesBody Mass IndexChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRespiratory Function Tests

Identifiers

PMID35648985
PMCPMC9150902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.