Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648828›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

A predictive microfluidic model of human glioblastoma to assess trafficking of blood-brain barrier-penetrant nanoparticles.

Joelle P Straehla, Cynthia Hajal, Hannah C Safford, Giovanni S Offeddu, Natalie Boehnke, Tamara G Dacoba, Jeffrey Wyckoff, Roger D Kamm, Paula T Hammond

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Exploring the anticancer potential of epigallocatechin gallate-loaded sodium alginate nanoparticles: impact of size variation on head and neck cancer cells.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Peptide-functionalized nanoparticles for brain-targeted therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joelle P StraehlaKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Cynthia HajalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-6703
Hannah C SaffordKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Giovanni S OffedduDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-3028-1873
Natalie BoehnkeKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Tamara G DacobaKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Jeffrey WyckoffKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Roger D KammDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-7232-304X
Paula T HammondKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology · USBoston Children's Hospital · USUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ES

Funding

VIRUS PRODUCTION COREP30CA014051 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Paula T Hammond · 1985 to 2026
$93.9M
Research Training in Pediatric OncologyT32CA136432 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI SCOTT A ARMSTRONG · 2009 to 2026
$7.9M
Research Supplement - Quantitative analyses of tumor cell extravasationU01CA202177 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KAMM, ROGER D · 2015 to 2020
$4.2M
Development of Physiologic Tissue Models to Assess Tumor Explant Response to Immune Checkpoint BlockadeU01CA214381 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI BARBIE, DAVID A, KAMM, ROGER D · 2017 to 2021
$3.5M
Cancer Research UK C42454/A28596NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014051NCI NIH HHS T32 CA136432NCI NIH HHS U01 CA202177NCI NIH HHS U01 CA214381NIBIB NIH HHS L40 EB028616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood–brain barrier represents a significant challenge for the treatment of high-grade gliomas, and our understanding of drug transport across this critical biointerface remains limited. To advance preclinical therapeutic development for gliomas, there is an urgent need for predictive in vitro models with realistic blood–brain-barrier vasculature. Here, we report a vascularized human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) model in a microfluidic device that accurately recapitulates brain tumor vasculature with self-assembled endothelial cells, astrocytes, and pericytes to investigate the transport of targeted nanotherapeutics across the blood–brain barrier and into GBM cells. Using modular layer-by-layer assembly, we functionalized the surface of nanoparticles with GBM-targeting motifs to improve trafficking to tumors. We directly compared nanoparticle transport in our in vitro platform with transport across mouse brain capillaries using intravital imaging, validating the ability of the platform to model in vivo blood–brain-barrier transport. We investigated the therapeutic potential of functionalized nanoparticles by encapsulating cisplatin and showed improved efficacy of these GBM-targeted nanoparticles both in vitro and in an in vivo orthotopic xenograft model. Our vascularized GBM model represents a significant biomaterials advance, enabling in-depth investigation of brain tumor vasculature and accelerating the development of targeted nanotherapeutics.

Indexed as

Blood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsCapillary PermeabilityGlioblastomaNanoparticlesAnimalsEndothelial CellsHumansMiceMicrofluidicsXenograft Model Antitumor Assaysblood–brain barrierdrug deliveryglioblastomamicrofluidicnanoparticle

Identifiers

PMID35648828
PMCPMC9191661
OpenAlexW4281875217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.