Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648753›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Quantifying preference for social stimuli in young children using two tasks on a mobile platform.

Indu Dubey, Simon Brett, Liliana Ruta, Rahul Bishain, Sharat Chandran, Supriya Bhavnani, Matthew K Belmonte, Georgia Lockwood Estrin, Mark Johnson, Teodora Gliga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Indu DubeyCentre for Autism, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3937-1058
Simon BrettCentre for Autism, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.
Liliana RutaInstitute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems, National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Messina, Italy.
Rahul BishainDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Sharat ChandranDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India.
Supriya BhavnaniCentre for Chronic Conditions and Injuries, Public Health Foundation of India, Gurgaon, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0855-2139
Matthew K BelmonteCom DEALL Trust, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4633-9400
Georgia Lockwood EstrinCentre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark JohnsonSchool of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Teodora GligaSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Bhismadev ChakrabartiCentre for Autism, School of Psychology & Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6649-7895
START consortium

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_MR/R018529/1Medical Research Council MR/P023894/1Medical Research Council MR/S036423/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children typically prefer to attend to social stimuli (e.g. faces, smiles) over non-social stimuli (e.g. natural scene, household objects). This preference for social stimuli is believed to be an essential building block for later social skills and healthy social development. Preference for social stimuli are typically measured using either passive viewing or instrumental choice paradigms, but not both. Since these paradigms likely tap into different mechanisms, the current study addresses this gap by administering both of these paradigms on an overlapping sample. In this study, we use a preferential looking task and an instrumental choice task to measure preference for social stimuli in 3-9 year old typically developing children. Children spent longer looking at social stimuli in the preferential looking task but did not show a similar preference for social rewards on the instrumental choice task. Task performance in these two paradigms were not correlated. Social skills were found to be positively related to the preference for social rewards on the choice task. This study points to putatively different mechanisms underlying the preference for social stimuli, and highlights the importance of choice of paradigms in measuring this construct.

Indexed as

RewardTask Performance and AnalysisChildChild, PreschoolHumans

Identifiers

PMID35648753
PMCPMC9159616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.