Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648745›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

COVID-19 vaccines uptake: Public knowledge, awareness, perception and acceptance among adult Africans.

John K Ahiakpa, Nanma T Cosmas, Felix E Anyiam, Kingsley O Enalume, Ibrahim Lawan, Ijuptil B Gabriel, Chinonyelum L Oforka, Hamze G Dahir, Salisu T Fausat, Maureen A Nwobodo and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

John K AhiakpaResearch Desk Consulting Limited, Kwabenya-Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1130-8700
Nanma T CosmasDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Jos, Jos, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7006-6190
Felix E AnyiamCentre for Health and Development, University of Port Harcourt, River State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2774-7406
Kingsley O EnalumeDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Effurun, Delta State, Nigeria.
Ibrahim LawanSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Ijuptil B GabrielYola Department of Biochemistry School of Life Sciences, Modibbo Adama University, Girei, Adamawa State, Nigeria.
Chinonyelum L OforkaDepartment of Zoology, University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Hamze G DahirSchool of Public Health and Nutrition, Amoud University Borama, Awdal, Somaliland.
Salisu T FausatDepartment of Zoology and Environmental Biology, Olabisi Onabanjo University, Ago-Iwoye, Ogun State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-7363-3066
Maureen A NwobodoPublic Health Department of Gregory University Uturu, Abia State, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0001-9226-7746
Getrude P MassaweThe Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Kinondoni, Tanzania.
Adachukwu S ObaghaAfrican Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-5490-4695
Debra U OkehDepartment of Community Medicine, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, Abia State, Nigeria.
Benjamin KarikariOrganisation of African Academic Doctors, OAAD, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-5398-2560
Samuel T AderonkeDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Olushola M AwoyemiDepartment of Environmental Toxicology, The Institute Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2093-0091
Idowu A AneyoDepartment of Zoology, University of Lagos, Akoka-Yaba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Funmilayo V DohertyYaba College of Technology, Lagos, Nigeria.
University of Lagos · NGAfrican Academy of Sciences · KEAmoud University · SOFederal Medical Centre · NGFederal University of Petroleum Resource Effurun · NGGregory University Uturu · NGModibbo Adama University of Technology · NGOlabisi Onabanjo University · NGOpen University of Tanzania · TZTexas Tech University · USUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Jos · NGUniversity of Port Harcourt · NGUniversity of St Andrews · GBYaba College of Technology · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe willingness of Africa's population to patronise the COVID-19 vaccines is critical to the efficiency of national immunisation programmes. This study surveys the views of adult African inhabitants toward vaccination and the possibility of participating or not participating in governments' efforts to get citizens vaccinated.

methodA cross-sectional online survey of adult Africans was undertaken from December 2020 to March 2021. Responses were anonymised. The Pearson Chi-square test was performed to determine whether or not there were any variations in knowledge, awareness, perception and acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines among the participants. Binomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with willingness to accept the COVID-19 vaccines and participate in immunisation programmes.

resultsThe results indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are more likely to be used by adult Africans over the age of 18 who are largely technologically savvy (55 percent) if the vaccine is made broadly available. A total of 33 percent of those who responded said they were unlikely to receive the vaccine, with another 15 percent stating they were undecided. Aside from that, we found that vaccine hesitancy was closely associated with socio-demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education and source of information. We also found that there were widespread conspiracies and myths about the COVID-19 vaccines.

conclusionMore than one-third of African adults who participated in the survey indicated they would not receive the COVID-19 vaccine, with majority of them expressing skepticisms about the vaccine's efficacy. It is possible that many of the people who would not be vaccinated would have an impact on the implementation of a COVID-19 immunisation programme that is meant for all of society. Majority of the respondents were unwilling to pay for the COVID-19 vaccines when made available. An awareness campaign should be focused on promoting the benefits of vaccination at the individual and population levels, as well as on taking preemptive actions to debunk misconceptions about the vaccines before they become further widespread.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdultCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedPerceptionCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID35648745
PMCPMC9159554
OpenAlexW4281808264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.