Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648641›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2022

cDC1 Vaccines Drive Tumor Rejection by Direct Presentation Independently of Host cDC1.

Stephen T Ferris, Ray A Ohara, Feiya Ou, Renee Wu, Xiao Huang, Sunkyung Kim, Jing Chen, Tian-Tian Liu, Robert D Schreiber, Theresa L Murphy and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEditorialComment
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen T FerrisDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-3340-2607
Ray A OharaDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7897-3169
Feiya OuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-8289-4025
Renee WuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-9521-1657
Xiao HuangDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-5225
Sunkyung KimDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-1375-6339
Jing ChenDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-5998-6930
Tian-Tian LiuDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-9938
Robert D SchreiberDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-1590-2341
Theresa L MurphyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-6539-8142
Kenneth M MurphyDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-9630
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Targeting Neoantigens in Triple Negative Breast CancerR01CA240983 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GILLANDERS, WILLIAM E., SCHREIBER, ROBERT DAVID · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
Molecular Basis of cDC1 DevelopmentR01AI162643 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2022 to 2025
$2.8M
Function of Wdfy4 in cross-presentation and immunityR01AI150297 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2019 to 2023
$2.5M
Understanding the Mechanisms of DC Licensing in CD8 T Cell PrimingR01CA248919 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
Mechanism of c-MYC repression by IRF8 in myeloid lineagesR21AI164142 · NIAID · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, KENNETH M · 2021 to 2022
$433k
The role of type 1 dendritic cells in CD4 and CD8 T cell anti-tumor immunityF30CA247262 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WU, RENEE PAULA · 2021 to 2023
$117k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA247262NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240983NCI NIH HHS R01 CA248919NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI150297NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162643NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI164142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a cell-based cancer vaccine, dendritic cells (DC), derived from peripheral blood monocytes or bone marrow (BM) treated with GM-CSF (GMDC), were initially thought to induce antitumor immunity by presenting tumor antigens directly to host T cells. Subsequent work revealed that GMDCs do not directly prime tumor-specific T cells, but must transfer their antigens to host DCs. This reduces their advantage over strictly antigen-based strategies proposed as cancer vaccines. Type 1 conventional DCs (cDC1) have been reported to be superior to GMDCs as a cancer vaccine, but whether they act by transferring antigens to host DCs is unknown. To test this, we compared antitumor responses induced by GMDCs and cDC1 in Irf8 +32-/- mice, which lack endogenous cDC1 and cannot reject immunogenic fibrosarcomas. Both GMDCs and cDC1 could cross-present cell-associated antigens to CD8+ T cells in vitro. However, injection of GMDCs into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice did not induce antitumor immunity, consistent with their reported dependence on host cDC1. In contrast, injection of cDC1s into tumors in Irf8 +32-/- mice resulted in their migration to tumor-draining lymph nodes, activation of tumor-specific CD8+ T cells, and rejection of the tumors. Tumor rejection did not require the in vitro loading of cDC1 with antigens, indicating that acquisition of antigens in vivo is sufficient to induce antitumor responses. Finally, cDC1 vaccination showed abscopal effects, with rejection of untreated tumors growing concurrently on the opposite flank. These results suggest that cDC1 may be a useful future avenue to explore for antitumor therapy. See related Spotlight by Hubert et al., p. 918.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesFibrosarcomaAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesDendritic CellsInterferon Regulatory FactorsMiceAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesInterferon Regulatory Factors

Identifiers

PMID35648641
PMCPMC9357132
OpenAlexW4281714784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.