Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648463›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Investigating the Efficacy of an 18-Week Postpartum Rehabilitation and Physical Development Intervention on Occupational Physical Performance and Musculoskeletal Health in UK Servicewomen: Protocol for an Independent Group Study Design.

Kirsty Jayne Elliott-Sale, Emma Louise Bostock, Thea Jackson, Sophie Louise Wardle, Thomas James O'Leary, Julie Patricia Greeves, Craig Sale

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04332757 (The Efficacy of a Post-Partum Physical Development Programme on Occupational Physical Performance and Musculoskeletal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04332757 naunknown statusnot on this map

The Efficacy of a Post-Partum Physical Development Programme on Occupational Physical Performance and Musculoskeletal Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottingham Trent UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsPostpartum PeriodArmsTraining intervention.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirsty Jayne Elliott-SaleMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1122-5099
Emma Louise BostockMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9340-8459
Thea JacksonMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-3984
Sophie Louise WardleArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-9094
Thomas James O'LearyArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1120-8777
Julie Patricia GreevesArmy Health and Performance Research, Army Headquarters, Andover, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0793-5338
Craig SaleMusculoskeletal Physiology Research Group, Sport, Health and Performance Enhancement Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5816-4169

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum women are at an increased risk of pelvic floor dysfunction, musculoskeletal injury, and poor psychological health and have reduced physical fitness compared to before pregnancy. There is no formal, evidence-based rehabilitation and physical development program for returning UK servicewomen to work following childbirth.

objectiveThis study aims to examine the efficacy of a rehabilitation and physical development intervention for returning postpartum UK servicewomen to occupational fitness.

methodsEligible servicewomen will be assigned to a training or control group in a nonrandomized controlled trial 6 weeks after childbirth. Group allocation will be based on the location of standard pregnancy and postpartum care. The control group will receive standard care, with no prescribed intervention. The training group will start an 18-week core and pelvic health rehabilitation program 6 weeks post partum and a 12-week resistance and high-intensity interval training program 12 weeks post partum. All participants will attend 4 testing sessions at 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks post partum for the assessment of occupational physical performance, pelvic health, psychological well-being, quality of life, and musculoskeletal health outcomes. Occupational physical performance tests will include vertical jump, mid-thigh pull, seated medicine ball throw, and a timed 2-km run. Pelvic health tests will include the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system, the PERFECT (power, endurance, repetitions, fast, every contraction timed) scheme for pelvic floor strength, musculoskeletal physiotherapy assessment, the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire, and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Vaginal Symptoms. Psychological well-being and quality of life tests will include the World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Musculoskeletal health outcomes will include body composition; whole-body areal bone mineral density; tibial volumetric bone mineral density, geometry, and microarchitecture; patella tendon properties; muscle architecture; muscle protein and collagen turnover; and muscle mass and muscle breakdown. Data will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with participants included as random effects, and group and time as fixed effects to assess within- and between-group differences over time.

resultsThis study received ethical approval in April 2019 and recruitment started in July 2019. The study was paused in March 2020 owing to the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruitment restarted in May 2021. The results are expected in September 2022.

conclusionsThis study will inform the best practice for the safe and optimal return of postpartum servicewomen to physically and mentally demanding jobs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04332757; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04332757. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/32315.

Indexed as

exerciseinterventionmusculoskeletalpelvic healthperformancepostnatalservicewomenwell-being

Identifiers

PMID35648463
PMCPMC9201705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.