Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648457›Full record

GuidelineJournal of medical Internet research2022

Strategies for Implementing Occupational eMental Health Interventions: Scoping Review.

Renaldo M Bernard, Claudia Toppo, Alberto Raggi, Marleen de Mul, Carlota de Miquel, Maria Teresa Pugliese, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Ana Ortiz-Tallo, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Sue Lukersmith and 4 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineScoping Review
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. PeerOnCall: Evaluating Implementation of App-Based Peer Support in Canadian Public Safety Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pandemic Preparedness among Big Energy Companies: Call to Research and Action.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Renaldo M BernardSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6958-3369
Claudia ToppoNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1312-6679
Alberto RaggiNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7433-7779
Marleen de MulErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3447-5920
Carlota de MiquelResearch, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3602-4146
Maria Teresa PuglieseNeurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4453-9908
Christina M van der Feltz-CornelisDepartment of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6925-8956
Ana Ortiz-TalloInstituto de Salud Carlos III, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-3930
Luis Salvador-CarullaHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5742-9866
Sue LukersmithHealth Research Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8202-3828
Leona Hakkaart-van RoijenErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0635-7388
Dorota Merecz-KotInstitute of Psychology, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8294-4309
Kaja StaszewskaDepartment of Health and Work Psychology, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lodz, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-3482
Carla SabariegoSwiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6946-0177

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of eMental health interventions, especially in the workplace, is a complex process. Therefore, learning from existing implementation strategies is imperative to ensure improvements in the adoption, development, and scalability of occupational eMental health (OeMH) interventions. However, the implementation strategies used for these interventions are often undocumented or inadequately reported and have not been systematically gathered across implementations in a way that can serve as a much-needed guide for researchers.

objectiveThe objective of this scoping review was to identify implementation strategies relevant to the uptake of OeMH interventions that target employees and detail the associated barriers and facilitation measures.

methodsA scoping review was conducted. The descriptive synthesis was guided by the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

resultsA total of 31 of 32,916 (0.09%) publications reporting the use of the web-, smartphone-, telephone-, and email-based OeMH interventions were included. In all, 98 implementation strategies, 114 barriers, and 131 facilitators were identified. The synthesis of barriers and facilitators produced 19 facilitation measures that provide initial recommendations for improving the implementation of OeMH interventions.

conclusionsThis scoping review represents one of the first steps in a research agenda aimed at improving the implementation of OeMH interventions by systematically selecting, shaping, evaluating, and reporting implementation strategies. There is a dire need for improved reporting of implementation strategies and combining common implementation frameworks with more technology-centric implementation frameworks to fully capture the complexities of eHealth implementation. Future research should investigate a wider range of common implementation outcomes for OeMH interventions that also focus on a wider set of common mental health problems in the workplace. This scoping review's findings can be critically leveraged by discerning decision-makers to improve the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of OeMH interventions.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthTelemedicineData CollectionHumansWorkplacebarrierseMental healthfacilitatorsimplementationmental healthmHealthmobile healthmobile phoneoccupational healthscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35648457
PMCPMC9201704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.