Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648445›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior circulation strokes: Outcomes and predictors of favorable outcome.

Gaultier Marnat, Benjamin Gory, Igor Sibon, Maeva Kyheng, Julien Labreuche, Grégoire Boulouis, Jean-Sebastien Liegey, Jildaz Caroff, François Eugène, Olivier Naggara and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mechanical thrombectomy failure in anterior and posterior circulation stroke: current results from a high-volume comprehensive center.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Gaultier MarnatNeuroradiology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7611-7753
Benjamin GoryDepartment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Igor SibonNeurology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-4215
Maeva KyhengCHU Lille, Department of Biostatistics, Lille, France.
Julien LabreucheCHU Lille, Department of Biostatistics, Lille, France.
Grégoire BoulouisNeuroradiology Department, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France.
Jean-Sebastien LiegeyNeurology Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Jildaz CaroffNeuroradiolology Department, CHU Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris, France.
François EugèneDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.
Olivier NaggaraDepartment of Neuroradiology, GHU Paris, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, INSERM-UMR-894, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Arturo ConsoliDepartment of Stroke Center and Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Versailles and Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Mikael MazighiDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, INSERM-1148, Fondation Rothschild Hospital, Paris, University of Paris, FHU-NeuroVASC, Paris, France.
Benjamin MaierDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, INSERM-1148, Fondation Rothschild Hospital, Paris, University of Paris, FHU-NeuroVASC, Paris, France.
Sebastien RichardDepartment of Neurology, CHRU-Nancy, Nancy, France.
Christian DenierNeurology Department, CHU Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris, France.
Guillaume TurcDepartment of Neurology, GHU Paris, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France.
Bertrand LapergueDepartment of Neurology, University of Versailles and Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
Romain BourcierDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Investigators
Inserm · FRBicêtre Hospital · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRCentre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDespite continuous improvement and growing knowledge in the endovascular therapy of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS), mechanical thrombectomy (MT) still fails to obtain satisfying intracranial recanalization in 10% to 15% of cases. However, little is known regarding clinical and radiological outcomes among this singularly underexplored subpopulation undergoing failed MT. We aimed to investigate the outcome after failed MT and identify predictive factors of favorable outcome despite recanalization failure.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients prospectively included in the ongoing observational multicenter Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke registry from January 2015 to September 2020. Patients presenting with anterior circulation LVOS treated with MT but experiencing failed intracranial recanalization defined as final modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score of 0, 1 and 2a were included. Clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed along with the exploration of predictive factors of Day-90 favorable outcome.

resultsThe study population comprised 533 patients. Mean age was 68.8 ± 16 years, and median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) were 17 (IQR 12-21) and 7 (IQR 5-8), respectively. Favorable outcomes were observed in 85 patients (18.2%) and 186 died (39.0%). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was 14.1%. In multivariable analysis, younger age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.98, p < 0.001), a lower admission NIHSS (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91, p < 0.001), a lower number of MT passes (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.77-0.87, p < 0.001), a lower delta ASPECTS between initial and Day-1 imaging (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.98, p = 0.026) and stroke etiology [significant difference among etiological subtypes (p = 0.024) with a tendency toward more favorable outcomes for dissection (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.71-5.67)] were significantly associated with a 90-day favorable outcome.

conclusionsIn this large retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry, we quantified the poor outcome after MT failure. We also identified factors associated with favorable outcome despite recanalization failure that might influence therapeutic management.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeAgedAged, 80 and overHumansIntracranial HemorrhagesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThrombectomyTreatment Outcomemechanical thrombectomyprognosisrecanalizationreperfusion failure

Identifiers

PMID35648445
PMCPMC9541042
OpenAlexW4281862635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.