Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648315›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

The role of eating disorders features, psychopathology, and defense mechanisms in the comprehension of orthorexic tendencies.

Giulia Costanzo, Daniela Marchetti, Giovanna Manna, Maria Cristina Verrocchio, Giorgio Falgares

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Giulia Costanzo *Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Daniela Marchetti *Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Giovanna MannaDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Maria Cristina VerrocchioDepartment of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Via dei Vestini, 66100, Chieti, Italy. mc.verrocchio@unich.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2549-1152
Giorgio FalgaresDepartment of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
University of Palermo · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent studies pointed out the importance to distinguish orthorexia nervosa (ON) from non-problematic forms of interest with healthy eating. This distinction needs to be further explored since it may favor a better comprehension of the relationship between orthorexic behaviors and psychopathology and lead to an improved understanding of the psychological processes implicated in ON. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to investigate the associations between ON and the core features of eating disorders (EDs), psychopathological symptoms and defense mechanisms, by differentiating three groups of individuals: an ON symptoms group, a healthy-eating control group, and a normal-eating control group.

methodsCollege students (n = 270, M

resultsCompared to the control groups, the ON symptoms group reported greater EDs' features, higher psychopathological symptoms and greater employment of different neurotic and immature defense mechanisms. No differences were found between groups with regard to obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

conclusionOur findings support the notion that ON behaviors should be carefully distinguished from non-problematic forms of interest with healthy eating. Indeed, results suggest that ON individuals are characterized by similar clinical features and defensive functioning as those observed in traditional EDs, indicating the importance of deepening our understanding of the relationship between these conditions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, descriptive cross-sectional study.

Indexed as

ComprehensionFeeding and Eating DisordersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDefense MechanismsFeeding BehaviorHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultDefense mechanismsEating disordersOrthorexiaPsychopathology

Identifiers

PMID35648315
PMCPMC9556392
OpenAlexW4281914631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.