ArticleIndian journal of pediatrics2022
Natural Versus Synthetic Surfactant Therapy in Respiratory Distress Syndrome of Prematurity.
Article in Indian journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic scoping review of the use of surfactant replacement therapy for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm neonates in low- and middle-income countries.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Pulmonary Surfactant in Adult ARDS: Current Perspectives and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo compare the clinical efficacy and the cost of treatment between the newborns who received either a natural or a protein-free synthetic surfactant for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) of prematurity.
methodsThis is a retrospective analytical study incorporating comparisons of clinical parameters and cost in newborns having RDS of prematurity who received either Survanta (bovine lung extract), a natural surfactant or Surfact (protein-free colfosceril palmitate), a synthetic surfactant.
resultsThere were 100 newborns who received either of the natural (n = 52) or synthetic (n = 48) surfactant with mean (SD) gestational age and mean (SD) birth weight of 31.5 (2.6) wk, 1425 (461) g and 32.2 (2.2) wk, 1519 (413) g, respectively. Majority of the newborns (> 90%) received endotracheal surfactant within the first 24 h of life and had similar baseline characteristics in either group. No differences were noted in ventilator settings on admission and 24 h after surfactant/admission. Oxygen requirement, extubation age, complications, hospital stay, and mortality were similar across groups, except that the necrotizing enterocolitis was noted only in natural surfactant group. There was a significant pharmacy cost savings in synthetic surfactant group.
conclusionSynthetic surfactant was comparable to natural surfactant with regard to outcomes, like ventilator settings, hospital stay, and mortality. Pharmacy cost was less in synthetic surfactant group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.