Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648299›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

Breast cancer incidence and survival in Scotland by socio-economic deprivation and tumour subtype.

Ines Mesa-Eguiagaray, Sarah H Wild, Sheila M Bird, Linda J Williams, David H Brewster, Peter S Hall, Jonine D Figueroa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ines Mesa-EguiagarayUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. ieguiaga@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6784-2419
Sarah H WildUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sheila M BirdUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Linda J WilliamsUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David H BrewsterUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Peter S HallUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Jonine D FigueroaUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. jonine.figueroa@ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5100-623X

Funding

Wellcome Trust 207800Wellcome Trust 207800/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen from socio-economically deprived areas are less likely to develop and then to survive breast cancer (BC). Whether associations between deprivation and BC incidence and survival differ by tumour molecular subtypes and mode of detection in Scotland are unknown.

methodsData consisted of 62,378 women diagnosed with invasive BC between 2000 and 2016 in Scotland. Incidence rates and time trends were calculated for oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) and negative (ER-) tumours and stratified by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) quintiles and screening status. SIMD is an area-based measure derived across seven domains: income, employment, education, health, access to services, crime and housing. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR [95% confidence intervals]) for BC death by immunohistochemical surrogates of molecular subtypes for the most versus the least deprived quintile. We adjusted for mode of detection and other confounders.

resultsIn Scotland, screen-detected ER+tumour incidence increased over time, particularly in the least deprived quintile [Average Annual Percentage Change (AAPC) = 2.9% with 95% CI from 1.2 to 4.7]. No marked differences were observed for non-screen-detected ER+tumours or ER- tumours by deprivation. BC mortality was higher in the most compared to the least deprived quintile irrespective of ER status (aHR = 1.29 [1.18, 1.41] for ER+ and 1.27 [1.09, 1.47] for ER- tumours). However, deprivation was associated with significantly higher mortality for luminal A and HER2-enriched tumours (aHR = 1.46 [1.13, 1.88] and 2.10 [1.23, 3.59] respectively) but weaker associations for luminal B and TNBC tumours that were not statistically significant.

conclusionsDeprivation is associated with differential BC incidence trends for screen-detected ER+tumours and with higher mortality for select tumour subtypes. Future efforts should evaluate factors that might be associated with reduced survival in deprived populations and monitor progress stratified by tumour subtypes and mode of detection.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEducational StatusFemaleHumansIncidenceIncomePovertySocioeconomic FactorsBreast cancerIncidenceMortalitySocio-economic statusSubtypes

Identifiers

PMID35648299
PMCPMC9239954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.