ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2022
Immunoglobulin and Monoclonal Antibody Therapies in Guillain-Barré Syndrome.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results From a Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of ANX005, a C1q Inhibitor, in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome.Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS · 2025Trial
- Screening of signaling pathways and hub genes in Guillain-Barré syndrome based on bioinformatics and machine learning.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Clinical spectrum and prognostic features of patients seropositive for anti-GD1a antibody.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Efgartigimod as a potential alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a retrospective study.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Therapeutic strategies targeting complement in myasthenia gravis patients.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- C1qAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- Evolving understanding of Guillain-Barré syndrome pathophysiology and the central role of the classical complement pathway in axonal injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- An updated review on Guillain-Barré syndrome: Challenges in infection prevention and control in low- and middle-income countries.SAGE open medicine · 2024Review
- Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in severe/critical COVID-19 adult patients.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Certain Immune-Mediated Neurological Disorders: Focus on a Novel Nanomembrane-Based Technology.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- C1q and central nervous system disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Rapidly progressive Guillain-Barré syndrome following amitriptyline overdose and severeFrontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune polyradiculoneuropathy affecting 1-2 subjects per 100,000 every year worldwide. It causes, in its classic form, symmetric weakness in the proximal and distal limb muscles with common involvement of the cranial nerves, particularly facial weakness. Respiratory function is compromised in a case in four. Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange in hastening time to recovery. Intravenous immunoglobulin was subsequently shown to be as efficacious as plasma exchange in adult subjects. In children, few trials have shown the benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin versus supportive care. Pharmacokinetic studies suggested a relationship between increase in immunoglobulin G level post-infusion and outcome, implying administration of larger doses may be beneficial in subjects with poor prognosis. However, a subsequent trial of a second dose of immunoglobulin in such subjects failed to show improved outcome, while demonstrating a higher risk of thromboembolic side-effects. Monoclonal antibody therapy has more recently been investigated for GBS, after multiple studies in animal models, with different agents and variable postulated mechanisms of action. Eculizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against the complement protein C5, was tested in in two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials. Neither showed benefit versus immunoglobulins alone on disability level at 4 weeks, although one study importantly suggested possible, clinically highly relevant, late effects on normalising function. A phase 3 trial is in progress. Preliminary results of a placebo-controlled ongoing study of ANX005, a humanised recombinant antibody against C1q inhibiting the complement cascade, have been promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.