Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35648158›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA2022

Evaluation of a remote telemedicine platform using a novel handheld fundus camera: Physician and patient perceptions from real-world experience.

Tsai-Chu Yeh, Kang-Jung Lo, De-Kuang Hwang, Tai-Chi Lin, Yu-Bai Chou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tsai-Chu YehSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Kang-Jung LoSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
De-Kuang HwangSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Tai-Chi LinSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yu-Bai ChouSchool of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Taipei Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough teleophthalmology has gained traction in recent years, it is at the center of the coronavirus disease pandemic. However, most hospitals are not ready owing to a severe lack of real-world experience. Furthermore, a limited number of studies have evaluated telemedicine applications on remote islands. This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical and referral accuracy, image quality, physician-perceived diagnostic certainty, and patient satisfaction with telemedicine eye screening using a novel handheld fundus camera in a rural and medically underserved population.

methodsThis prospective study included 176 eyes from a remote island. All participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. Nonmydriatic retinal images obtained using a handheld fundus camera were reviewed by two retinal specialists to determine image quality, diagnosis, and need for referrals. The agreement of diagnosis between image-based assessments was compared with that of binocular indirect ophthalmoscopic assessments.

resultsImage quality of fundus photographs was considered acceptable or ideal in 97.7% and 95.5% of eyes assessed by two reviewers, respectively. There was considerable agreement in diagnosis between the indirect ophthalmoscopic assessment and image-based assessment by two reviewers (Cohen's kappa = 0.80 and 0.78, respectively). Likewise, substantial agreement was achieved in the referrals. The sensitivity for referable retinopathy from the two reviewers was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-91%) and 78% (95% CI, 57%-91%), whereas specificity was 99% (95% CI, 95%-99%] and 98% (95% CI, 93%-99%), respectively. For physicians' perceived certainty of diagnosis, 93.8% and 90.3% were considered either certain or reliable. Overall, 97.4% of participants were satisfied with their experiences and greatly valued the telemedicine services.

conclusionNovel fundus camera-based telemedicine screening demonstrated high accuracy in detecting clinically significant retinopathy in real-world settings. It achieved high patient satisfaction and physician-perceived certainty in diagnosis with reliable image quality, which may be scaled internationally to overcome geographical barriers under the global pandemic.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyOphthalmologyPhysiciansRetinal DiseasesTelemedicineHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35648158
PMCPMC12755610
OpenAlexW4281960662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.