ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022
Spectrum of bacterial keratitis in North India: A retrospective analysis of six years at a tertiary care eye center.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status on antimicrobial resistance in keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- 10-year analysis of microbiological profiles and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility: the Kent microbial keratitis study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Risk Factors and Common Organisms in Bacterial Keratitis in a Tertiary Center in Iran.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2026Article
- The antibiotic resistance profiles of Staphylococcus in the Asia Cornea Society infectious keratitis study.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Whole Genome Analysis of Ocular Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Reveals Genetic Diversity.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Recent Nanotechnological Trends in the Management of Microbial Keratitis.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2024Review
- Characterization of infectious bacterial keratitis in Östergötland County, Sweden: a 10-year retrospective study.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2024Article
- A comparison of antimicrobial regimen outcomes and antibiogram development in microbial keratitis: a prospective cohort study in Alexandria, Egypt.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of bacterial keratitis: a retrospective analysis of eight years in a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Southwest China.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024Article
- Innovative cold atmospheric plasma (iCAP) decreases corneal ulcer formation and bacterial loads and improves anterior chamber health in methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis.Experimental eye research · 2023Article
- Corneal biopsy as a primary diagnostic tool in microbial keratitis patients on poly-antimicrobials.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the pattern of bacterial pathogens causing infective keratitis and their resistance to the recommended antibiotics over six years. Methods: It was a retrospective study of 9,357 cases of bacterial keratitis from January 2015 to December 2020, at a tertiary care ophthalmic center. A total of 9,547 corneal specimens were obtained from the study subjects. Demographic details of the patients, pathogenic bacteria isolated, and their antimicrobial susceptibility were noted and analyzed. Results: Bacterial pathogens were identified in 23.52% of the specimens. The most common isolates were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (60.75%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.23%), Staphylococcus aureus (13.92%), gram negative bacilli of the family Enterobacterales (8.64%), Streptococcus spp. (1.72%), Acinetobacter spp. (0.13%), and other non-fermenting gram-negative bacilli (0.57%). In Staphylococci, 55-80% of isolates were resistant to erythromycin, and 40-70% to fluoroquinolones, while no resistance was observed against vancomycin. 40-60% of isolates of P. aeruginosa were resistant to cephalosporins, 40-55% to fluoroquinolones, and 30-60% to aminoglycosides. Also, 40-80% of isolates of Enterobacterales were resistant to cephalosporins, and 50-60% to fluoroquinolones. Most gram-negative isolates were susceptible to carbapenems and polymyxin B. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, our study is the largest compilation of microbiological profile of bacterial keratitis from North India. It highlights the current trend of the bacterial pathogens that cause infectious keratitis. Staphylococci and Pseudomonas were found to be the most common pathogens. Increased resistance was seen against some of the commonly prescribed empirical antibiotics. Such evidence is useful for restructuring the empirical prescription practices from time to time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.