Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647953›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Evaluation of ocular surface and tear function - A review of current approaches for dry eye.

Shizuka Koh, Srinivas K Rao, Sanjeev P Srinivas, Louis Tong, Alvin L Young

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The tale of an eroded strip - The tearscope conundrum.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shizuka KohDepartments of Innovative Visual Science and Ophthalmology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Srinivas K RaoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Darshan Eye Care and Surgical Centre, Chennai, India.
Sanjeev P SrinivasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Darshan Eye Care and Surgical Centre, Chennai, India.
Louis TongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, NUS, Singapore.
Alvin L YoungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, PRC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increasing prevalence of dry eye disease in the past decade has resulted in a greater focus on diagnostic methods for this condition. There has been a proliferation of technologies that attempt to quantify various aspects of tear function and ocular surface health. However, a cost-effective, simple, and efficient method remains elusive. In the Indian context, the majority of these patients present to the general ophthalmologist, and a clinical approach that is quick and easy to perform would allow widespread usage for accurate diagnosis. This article reviews currently available methods and their relevance to the general ophthalmologist.

Indexed as

Dry Eye SyndromesLacerationsCost-Benefit AnalysisFaceHumansTearsDry eye diseaseocular surfacetear film

Identifiers

PMID35647953
PMCPMC9359282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.