Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647938›Full record

Trial reportCancer2022

Circulating tumor and invasive cell expression profiling predicts effective therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Kenneth H Yu, Jennifer Park, Avni Mittal, Ghassan K Abou-Alfa, Imane El Dika, Andrew S Epstein, David H Ilson, David P Kelsen, Geoffrey Y Ku, Jia Li and 10 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02555735 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Evaluation of Exceptional Responders With Solid Tumor Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorAdera Labs, LLCRan2015 to 2027Enrolled250ConditionsSolid Tumor NeoplasmsArmsStandard of Care Chemotherapy
NCT03033927 active not recruitingnot on this map

Circulating Tumor Cell and Tumor Tissue Models for Predicting Effective Pancreatic Cancer Response

TypeobservationalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2017 to 2027Enrolled74ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaArmsCTC isolocation and analysis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth H YuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4774-2672
Jennifer ParkMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Avni MittalMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ghassan K Abou-AlfaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1522-8054
Imane El DikaMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew S EpsteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1808-3070
David H IlsonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
David P KelsenMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6139-438X
Geoffrey Y KuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jia LiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Wungki ParkMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Anna M VargheseMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Joanne F-L ChouMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Marinela CapanuMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Brandon CooperAdera Biolabs, Germantown, Maryland, USA.
Andrew BartlettAdera Biolabs, Germantown, Maryland, USA.
Devan McCarthyAdera Biolabs, Germantown, Maryland, USA.
Vineet SangarAdera Biolabs, Germantown, Maryland, USA.
Brian McCarthyAdera Biolabs, Germantown, Maryland, USA.
Eileen M O'ReillyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8076-9199
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USIntelligent Fusion Technology (United States) · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Pharmacogenomic and circulating tumor cell approach to individualized treatment of pancreatic cancerR01CA202762 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MCCARTHY, BRIAN J., YU, KENNETH H. · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Estimating Cancer Risks of Rare Genetic VariantsR01CA131010 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BEGG, COLIN B, CAPANU, MARINELA · 2008 to 2010
$944k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131010NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a refractory disease; however, modern cytotoxic chemotherapeutics can induce tumor regression and extend life. A blood-based, pharmacogenomic, chemosensitivity assay using gene expression profiling of circulating tumor and invasive cells (CTICs) to predict treatment response was previously developed. The combination regimen of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (G/nab-P) are established frontline approaches for treating advanced PDAC; however, there are no validated biomarkers for treatment selection. A similar unmet need exists for choosing second-line therapy.

methodsThe chemosensitivity assay was evaluated in metastatic PDAC patients presenting for frontline treatment. A prospective study enrolled patients (n = 70) before receiving either FOLFIRINOX or G/nab-P at a 1:1 ratio. Six milliliters of peripheral blood was collected at baseline and at time of disease progression. CTICs were isolated, gene-expression profiling was performed, and the assay was used to predict effective and ineffective chemotherapeutic agents. Treating physicians were blinded to the assay prediction results.

resultsPatients receiving an effective regimen as predicted by the chemosensitivity assay experienced significantly longer median progression-free survival (mPFS; 7.8 months vs. 4.2 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.35; p = .0002) and median overall survival (mOS; 21.0 months vs. 9.7 months; HR, 0.40; p = .005), compared with an ineffective regimen. Assay prediction for effective second-line therapy was explored. The entire study cohort experienced favorable outcomes compared with historical controls, 7.1-month mPFS and 12.3-month mOS.

conclusionsChemosensitivity assay profiling is a promising tool for guiding therapy in advanced PDAC. Further prospective validation is under way (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03033927).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsAlbuminsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinPaclitaxelProspective StudiesAlbuminsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilLeucovorinPaclitaxelchemotherapycirculating tumor and invasive cellsgene expression modelingpancreatic cancerpersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID35647938
PMCPMC10131181
OpenAlexW4281963158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.