ArticleJACS Au2022
New Strategies for Direct Methane-to-Methanol Conversion from Active Learning Exploration of 16 Million Catalysts.
Article in JACS Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge Graph for Methane Selective Conversion: Revisiting and Predicting Product Selectivity and Methane Conversion.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Reaction-conditioned generative model for catalyst design and optimization with CatDRX.Communications chemistry · 2025Article
- High-Throughput Discovery of Ferrocene Mechanophores with Enhanced Reactivity and Network Toughening.ACS central science · 2025Article
- Graph neural networks for predicting metal-ligand coordination of transition metal complexes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- AI Approaches to Homogeneous Catalysis with Transition Metal Complexes.ACS catalysis · 2025Review
- A Deep Generative Model for the Inverse Design of Transition Metal Ligands and Complexes.JACS Au · 2025Article
- Mechanistic Insights into the Direct Partial Oxidation of Methane to Methanol Catalyzed by Single-Atom Transition Metals on Hydroxyapatite.ACS omega · 2025Article
- AABBA Graph Kernel: Atom-Atom, Bond-Bond, and Bond-Atom Autocorrelations for Machine Learning.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- LigandDiff: de Novo Ligand Design for 3D Transition Metal Complexes with Diffusion Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Automated de Novo Design of Olefin Metathesis Catalysts: Computational and Experimental Analysis of a Simple Thermodynamic Design Criterion.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Electronic structure of metal oxide dications with ammonia ligands and their reactivity towards the selective conversion of methane to methanol.Frontiers in chemistry · 2024Article
- Catalysing (organo-)catalysis: Trends in the application of machine learning to enantioselective organocatalysis.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2024Review
- Economically viable co-production of methanol and sulfuric acid via direct methane oxidation.Communications chemistry · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite decades of effort, no earth-abundant homogeneous catalysts have been discovered that can selectively oxidize methane to methanol. We exploit active learning to simultaneously optimize methane activation and methanol release calculated with machine learning-accelerated density functional theory in a space of 16 M candidate catalysts including novel macrocycles. By constructing macrocycles from fragments inspired by synthesized compounds, we ensure synthetic realism in our computational search. Our large-scale search reveals that low-spin Fe(II) compounds paired with strong-field (e.g., P or S-coordinating) ligands have among the best energetic tradeoffs between hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and methanol release. This observation contrasts with prior efforts that have focused on high-spin Fe(II) with weak-field ligands. By decoupling equatorial and axial ligand effects, we determine that negatively charged axial ligands are critical for more rapid release of methanol and that higher-valency metals [i.e., M(III) vs M(II)] are likely to be rate-limited by slow methanol release. With full characterization of barrier heights, we confirm that optimizing for HAT does not lead to large oxo formation barriers. Energetic span analysis reveals designs for an intermediate-spin Mn(II) catalyst and a low-spin Fe(II) catalyst that are predicted to have good turnover frequencies. Our active learning approach to optimize two distinct reaction energies with efficient global optimization is expected to be beneficial for the search of large catalyst spaces where no prior designs have been identified and where linear scaling relationships between reaction energies or barriers may be limited or unknown.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.