ReviewJACS Au2022
Switched Proton Conduction in Metal-Organic Frameworks.
Review in JACS Au, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building Chemistry from "Lego" Blocks: Metal-Organic Frameworks after the 2025 Nobel Prize.ACS central science · 2026Review
- Photo-Modulated Proton Transport in Merocyanine Metastable-State Photoacid Based Polymers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Proton Conduction in Zirconium-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Advanced Applications.ACS applied electronic materials · 2025Review
- Confinement-Driven Aggregate Formation of Photoacids within Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Superprotonic Conductivity in a Metalloporphyrin-Based SMOF (Supramolecular Metal-Organic Framework).Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Proton conducting metal-organic frameworks with light response for multistate logic gates.RSC advances · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stimuli-responsive materials can respond to external effects, and proton transport is widespread and plays a key role in living systems, making stimuli-responsive proton transport in artificial materials of particular interest to researchers due to its desirable application prospects. On the basis of the rapid growth of proton-conducting porous metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), switched proton-conducting MOFs have also begun to attract attention. MOFs have advantages in crystallinity, porosity, functionalization, and structural designability, and they can facilitate the fabrication of novel switchable proton conductors and promote an understanding of the comprehensive mechanisms. In this Perspective, we highlight the current progress in the rational design and fabrication of stimuli-responsive proton-conducting MOFs and their applications. The dynamic structural change of proton transfer pathways and the role of trigger molecules are discussed to elucidate the stimuli-responsive mechanisms. Subsequently, we also discuss the challenges and propose new research opportunities for further development.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.