Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647578›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genome editing2022

Genome Editing for Sustainable Agriculture in Africa.

Leena Tripathi, Kanwarpal S Dhugga, Valentine O Ntui, Steven Runo, Easter D Syombua, Samwel Muiruri, Zhengyu Wen, Jaindra N Tripathi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genome editing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leena TripathiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Kanwarpal S DhuggaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Valentine O NtuiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Steven RunoKenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Easter D SyombuaInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Samwel MuiruriInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya.
Zhengyu WenInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.
Jaindra N TripathiInternational Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Nairobi, Kenya.
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture · KECentro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo · MXKenyatta University · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable intensification of agriculture in Africa is essential for accomplishing food and nutritional security and addressing the rising concerns of climate change. There is an urgent need to close the yield gap in staple crops and enhance food production to feed the growing population. In order to meet the increasing demand for food, more efficient approaches to produce food are needed. All the tools available in the toolbox, including modern biotechnology and traditional, need to be applied for crop improvement. The full potential of new breeding tools such as genome editing needs to be exploited in addition to conventional technologies. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas)-based genome editing has rapidly become the most prevalent genetic engineering approach for developing improved crop varieties because of its simplicity, efficiency, specificity, and easy to use. Genome editing improves crop variety by modifying its endogenous genome free of any foreign gene. Hence, genome-edited crops with no foreign gene integration are not regulated as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in several countries. Researchers are using CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing for improving African staple crops for biotic and abiotic stress resistance and improved nutritional quality. Many products, such as disease-resistant banana, maize resistant to lethal necrosis, and sorghum resistant to the parasitic plant Striga and enhanced quality, are under development for African farmers. There is a need for creating an enabling environment in Africa with science-based regulatory guidelines for the release and adoption of the products developed using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Some progress has been made in this regard. Nigeria and Kenya have recently published the national biosafety guidelines for the regulation of gene editing. This article summarizes recent advances in developments of tools, potential applications of genome editing for improving staple crops, and regulatory policies in Africa.

Indexed as

African cropsagricultureCRISPR/Casgenome editingregulatory policies

Identifiers

PMID35647578
PMCPMC9133388
OpenAlexW4280596617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.