Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647510›Full record

ArticleForensic science international. Synergy2022

The need for research-based tools for personnel selection and assessment in the forensic sciences.

Randall D Spain, Jerry W Hedge, Dawn Ohse, Alice White

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science international. Synergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic science management, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Challenges to reasoning in forensic science decisions.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Randall D SpainNorth Carolina State University, Campus Box 8206, Raleigh, NC, 27695-8206, USA.
Jerry W HedgeRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Dawn OhseRTI International, 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd., Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709, USA.
Alice WhiteEvolve Forensics, LLC, P.O. Box 232196, Las Vegas, NV, 89105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularity of forensic science television programs has created a hiring challenge for forensic science laboratories. Laboratories receive unprecedented numbers of applicants, yet struggle to identify highly-qualified candidates. Forensic examiners must possess a unique set of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) plus other characteristics. They must be critical thinkers, detail-oriented, decisive, and self-regulated; be able to communicate clearly and effectively within the laboratory, with customers (typically investigators or attorneys), and in the courtroom; and demonstrate the required core competencies. Currently, no validated instruments, standardized job descriptions, or lists of KSAs exist to aid in forensic science personnel recruitment and assessment, often resulting in high turnover leading to costly new recruitment and training cycles. This article describes how industrial/organizational psychology develops methods and tools to improve workforce selection; describes some tools currently in use in forensic science; and advocates for research and development of better tools for use in forensic science.

Indexed as

AssessmentForensic sciencesPersonnel seletionTesting

Identifiers

PMID35647510
PMCPMC9136313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.