ArticleBiophysicist (Rockville, Md.)2020
Reflections on undergraduate research mentoring.
Article in Biophysicist (Rockville, Md.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Trypan Blue-Based ELISA Practice Test to Evaluate Trainee Performance.Journal of chemical education · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Recruiting talented high school and college students to consider a career in the biomedical or biophysical sciences is important, yet often difficult. Encouraging students in regions like Appalachia adds additional challenges due to socioeconomic hurdles and misperceptions. This brief report contains the reflections of a research mentor engaging with students as a high school physics teacher, a principal investigator at research-intensive university, and as a principal investigator at a predominantly undergraduate-focused research university, as well as the viewpoint of a former undergraduate student in the mentor's lab. Different hurdles stand in the way of success at each level. A key issue at the high school level is engaging students in 'real science', the discovery of new knowledge and ideas. With undergraduate students at a larger research institution, a key issue is for the student to have opportunities to engage in meaningful scientific research. At a smaller and more rural research institution, especially in Appalachia, many students have socioeconomic concerns and misconceptions of what scientific careers entail. Regardless of background and environment, there are certain students who thrive on the scientific curiosity to discover new things. All they need is that opportunity to engage in meaningful scientific discovery to become interested in a scientific career.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.