Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647412›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology

Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy With a Median Biologically Effective Dose of 100 Gy

Tugce Kutuk, Robert Herrera, Teuta Z Mustafayev, Gorkem Gungor, Gamze Ugurluer, Banu Atalar, Rupesh Kotecha, Matthew D Hall, Muni Rubens, Kathryn E Mittauer and 11 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tugce KutukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Robert HerreraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Teuta Z MustafayevDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gorkem GungorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gamze UgurluerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Banu AtalarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Rupesh KotechaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Matthew D HallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Muni RubensDepartment of Clinical Informatics, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Kathryn E MittauerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Jessika A ContrerasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
James McCullochDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Noah S KalmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Diane AlvarezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Tino RomagueraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Alonso N GutierrezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Jacklyn GarciaHerbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida.
Adeel KaiserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Minesh P MehtaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Enis OzyarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Michael D ChuongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
Baptist Hospital of Miami · USFlorida International University · USBaptist Health South Florida · USKent Hastanesi · TRAcıbadem Adana Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Randomized data show a survival benefit of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy in selected patients with oligometastases (OM). Stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may facilitate the delivery of ablative dose for OM lesions, especially those adjacent to historically dose-limiting organs at risk, where conventional approaches preclude ablative dosing. Methods and Materials: The RSSearch Registry was queried for OM patients (1-5 metastatic lesions) treated with SMART. Freedom from local progression (FFLP), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (LS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. FFLP was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 criteria. Results: Ninety-six patients with 108 OM lesions were treated on a 0.35 T MR Linac at 2 institutions between 2018 and 2020. SMART was delivered to mostly abdominal or pelvic lymph nodes (48.1%), lung (18.5%), liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (16.7%), and adrenal gland (11.1%). The median prescribed radiation therapy dose was 48.5 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-15). The median biologically effective dose corrected using an alpha/beta value of 10 was 100 Gy Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents the largest analysis of SMART using ablative dosing for non-bone OM. A median prescribed biologically effective dose of 100 Gy

Identifiers

PMID35647412
PMCPMC9130084
OpenAlexW4224313623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.