ArticleeNeurologicalSci2022
Rare pitfall in the magnetic resonance imaging of status epilepticus.
Article in eNeurologicalSci, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain MRI in Status Epilepticus (SE) is often helpful in diagnosis, lateralization and localization of the seizure focus. MRI changes in SE include predominantly ipsilateral diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) changes in the hippocampus and pulvinar or similar changes involving basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum, brain stem and external capsule (Chatzikonstantinou et al., 2011 [1]). These changes are thought to be due to transient vasogenic and cytotoxic edema due to either transient damage or breakdown of blood brain barrier, proportional to the frequency and duration of the epileptic activity (Amato et al., 2001 [2]). Such changes may also be reflected on T2- weighted and T2-Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) sequences of MRI. Herein, we present a case of a transient FLAIR cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hyperintensity on the second MRI brain in a patient with focal status epilepticus. This imaging finding led to diagnostic confusion and was initially thought to represent subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, lumbar puncture, brain computed tomography (CT), and a follow-up brain MRI ruled out that possibility and other CSF pathologies. We concluded that the transient FLAIR changes in the second brain MRI were related to a rare imaging pitfall caused by Gadolinium enhancement of CSF on the FLAIR sequence, popularly referred to as hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.