Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647309›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2022

Wake-up stroke and unknown-onset stroke; occurrence and characteristics from the nationwide Norwegian Stroke Register.

Mary-Helen Søyland, Arnstein Tveiten, Agnethe Eltoft, Halvor Øygarden, Torunn Varmdal, Bent Indredavik, Ellisiv B Mathiesen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mary-Helen SøylandDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4219-7855
Arnstein TveitenDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.
Agnethe EltoftDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Halvor ØygardenDepartment of Neurology, Hospital of Southern Norway, Kristiansand, Norway.
Torunn VarmdalNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-9651
Bent IndredavikNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Ellisiv B MathiesenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8887-6100
Hospital of Southern Norway · NONorwegian University of Science and Technology · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NOUniversity of Agder · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Population-based knowledge of the characteristics of wake-up stroke and unknown-onset stroke is limited. We compared occurrence and characteristics of ischaemic and haemorrhagic wake-up stroke, unknown-onset stroke and known-onset stroke in a nationwide register-based study. Patients and methods: We included patients registered in the Norwegian Stroke Register from 2012 through 2019. Age, sex, risk factors, clinical characteristics, acute stroke treatment and discharge destination were compared according to stroke type and time of onset. Results: Of the 60,320 patients included, 11,451 (19%) had wake-up stroke, 11,098 (18.4%) had unknown time of onset and 37,771 (62.6%) had known symptom onset. The proportion of haemorrhagic stroke was lower among wake-up stroke patients (1107/11,451, 9.7%, 95% CI: 9.1-10.2) than for known-onset stroke (5230/37,771, 13.8%, 95% CI: 13.5-14.2) and for unknown-onset stroke (1850/11,098, 16.7%, 95% CI: 16.0-17.4). Mild stroke (NIHSS <5) was more frequent in ischaemic wake-up stroke (5364/8308, 64.6%, 95% CI: 63.5-65.5) than in known-onset (16,417/26,746, 61.4%, 95% CI: 60.8-62.0) and unknown-onset stroke (3242/5853, 55.4%, 95% CI: 54.1-56.7), while baseline characteristics were otherwise similar to known-onset stroke. Unknown-onset stroke patients were more often female, lived alone and had more severe strokes compared to wake-up stroke and known-onset stroke patients. Unknown-onset stroke patients were more often in need of community-based health care on discharge and had a higher in-hospital mortality. Discussion and conclusions: Ischaemic wake-up strokes shared baseline characteristics with known-onset strokes, but tended to be milder. Ischaemic unknown-onset stroke patients differed significantly from wake-up stroke, emphasising the importance of considering them as separate entities.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular disease/strokeepidemiologyhaemorrhagic strokeintracerebral haemorrhageintracranial haemorrhageischaemic strokewake-up stroke

Identifiers

PMID35647309
PMCPMC9134780
OpenAlexW4226487442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.