ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Clinical Outcomes After Suture Tape Augmentation for Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- All-Inside Arthroscopic Lateral Capsular Shift for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability With Poor Ligament Remnants: A Retrospective Comparative Study With the Arthroscopic Modified Bröstrom Procedure.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Augmented Broström and Improved Functional Outcomes as Measured by PROMIS Scores Compared With Broström Without Augmentation.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Suture Augmentation May Be Beneficial for Patients With Generalized Ligamentous Laxity Undergoing Modified Broström-Gould Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Current concepts in the surgical management of chronic ankle lateral ligament instability.Journal of orthopaedicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is minimal literature on the use of suture tape augmentation in the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI), prompting an investigation on its use and effect during surgery of the lateral ankle. Purpose: To evaluate the evidence for the use of suture tape augmentation in the treatment of CLAI and the outcomes after this procedure. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A literature search was performed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated the use of suture tape for CLAI. Outcome measures included the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, return to play, and radiological improvement in anterior talar translation and talar tilt angle. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Results: There were 11 studies (2 with level 2 evidence, 1 with level 3, and 8 with level 4) including 334 patients (334 ankles) that underwent suture-tape augmentation. The mean age was 27.3 years, 67.3% were women, and the mean follow-up was 27.6 months (range, 11.5-38.5 months). The mean weighted postoperative AOFAS score was 95, and 87.7% were able to return to sports. Overall, 9 recurrent instability events (4.1%) were reported. In 3 studies that compared Broström repair and suture tape augmentation, there were no significant differences between the procedures in recurrent instability (mean difference [MD], 0.81 [95% CI, 0.19 to 3.50]; Conclusion: Suture tape augmentation did not significantly improve clinical or radiological outcomes in the setting of modified Broström repair for CLAI. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend suture tape augmentation for all patients at this time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.