Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647170›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022

Flap failure prediction in microvascular tissue reconstruction using machine learning algorithms.

Yu-Cang Shi, Jie Li, Shao-Jie Li, Zhan-Peng Li, Hui-Jun Zhang, Ze-Yong Wu, Zhi-Yuan Wu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Cang ShiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Jie LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Shao-Jie LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhan-Peng LiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Hui-Jun ZhangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Ze-Yong WuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China.
Zhi-Yuan WuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China. 1608700812@qq.com.
Guangdong Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrovascular tissue reconstruction is a well-established, commonly used technique for a wide variety of the tissue defects. However, flap failure is associated with an additional hospital stay, medical cost burden, and mental stress. Therefore, understanding of the risk factors associated with this event is of utmost importance.

aimTo develop machine learning-based predictive models for flap failure to identify the potential factors and screen out high-risk patients.

methodsUsing the data set of 946 consecutive patients, who underwent microvascular tissue reconstruction of free flap reconstruction for head and neck, breast, back, and extremity, we established three machine learning models including random forest classifier, support vector machine, and gradient boosting. Model performances were evaluated by the indicators such as area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. A multivariable regression analysis was performed for the most critical variables in the random forest model.

resultsPost-surgery, the flap failure event occurred in 34 patients (3.6%). The machine learning models based on various preoperative and intraoperative variables were successfully developed. Among them, the random forest classifier reached the best performance in receiver operating characteristic curve, with an area under the curve score of 0.770 in the test set. The top 10 variables in the random forest were age, body mass index, ischemia time, smoking, diabetes, experience, prior chemotherapy, hypertension, insulin, and obesity. Interestingly, only age, body mass index, and ischemic time were statistically associated with the outcomes.

conclusionMachine learning-based algorithms, especially the random forest classifier, were very important in categorizing patients at high risk of flap failure. The occurrence of flap failure was a multifactor-driven event and was identified with numerous factors that warrant further investigation. Importantly, the successful application of machine learning models may help the clinician in decision-making, understanding the underlying pathologic mechanisms of the disease, and improving the long-term outcome of patients.

Indexed as

Flap failureMachine learningMicrovascular procedureRandom forestRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35647170
PMCPMC9100718
OpenAlexW4224293330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.