ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Primary malignant peritoneal mesothelioma mimicking tuberculous peritonitis: A case report.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare malignancy arising in mesothelial cells in the peritoneum. It can be mistaken for many other diseases, such as peritoneal carcinomatosis and tuberculous peritonitis (TBP), because its clinical manifestations are often nonspecific. Therefore, the diagnosis of MPM is often challenging and delayed. CASE SUMMARY: A 42-year-old man was referred to our hospital with lower abdominal pain for 1 wk and ascites observed under abdominal sonography. His laboratory findings revealed an isolated elevated tumor marker of carcinoma antigen 125 (167.4 U/mL; normal, < 35 U/mL), and contrast enhanced computed tomography showed peritoneal thickening. Thus, differential diagnoses of TBP, carcinomatosis of an unknown nature, and primary peritoneal malignancy were considered. After both esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy produced negative findings, laparoscopic intervention was performed. The histopathological results revealed mesothelioma invasion into soft tissue composed of a papillary, tubular, single-cell arrangement of epithelioid cells. In addition, immunohistochemical staining was positive for mesothelioma markers and negative for adenocarcinoma markers. Based on the above findings, TBP was excluded, and the patient was diagnosed with MPM.
conclusionIt is important to distinguish MPM from TBP because they have similar symptoms and blood test findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.