ReviewWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Elevated intra-abdominal pressure: A review of current knowledge.
Review in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Different Pneumoperitoneum Pressures on Internal Carotid Artery Blood Flow and Cerebral Oxygenation in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Obesity surgery · 2026Trial
- The impact of core training combined with breathing exercises on individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain.Frontiers in public health · 2025Trial
- An integrated overview of acute heart failure: a narrative review of pathophysiological mechanisms and contributing factors.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Review
- Device therapies in cardiorenal syndrome: an expert review.ESC heart failure · 2026Review
- Renal consequences of complex abdominal wall reconstruction.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Assessment of the impact of furosemide use on outcomes in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: a retrospective cohort study from the MIMIC-IV database.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Elevated Intra-Abdominal Pressure as a Prognostic Marker of Enteral Nutrition Intolerance and Adverse Outcomes in Neurocritical Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Article
- Contribution of tissue oximetry to the assessment of renal dysfunction in abdominal compartment syndrome: an experimental canine study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Development of a nomogram prediction model for postoperative intra-abdominal hypertension in patients with intra-abdominal infection sepsis based on analgesic drug selection.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Multimodal Prehabilitation for Hernia Repair: Linking Metabolic Modulation and Mechanical Methods.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Anesthetic Challenges in the Management of a Rare Giant Biliary Mucinous Cystadenoma With Major Vascular Compression.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Venous thromboembolism after ventral hernia repair with transversus abdominis release.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Acute Compartment Syndrome and Intra-Abdominal Hypertension, Decompression, Current Pharmacotherapy, and Stable Gastric Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 Solution.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Management of giant inguinal hernia; report of four cases and review of literature.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Review
- Changes of abdominal wall tension across various resistance exercises during maximal and submaximal loads in healthy adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Non-invasive and continuous intra-abdominal pressure assessment using MC sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring with Electrical Cardiometry During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery, a Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Internal jugular distensibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing elective surgery - A prospective accuracy study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is a known cause of increased morbidity and mortality among critically ill patients. Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome can lead to rapid deterioration of organ function and the development of multiple organ failure. Raised IAP affects every system and main organ in the human body. Even marginally sustained IAH results in malperfusion and may disrupt the process of recovery. Yet, despite being so common, this potentially lethal condition often goes unnoticed. In 2004, the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome, an international multidisciplinary consensus group, was formed to provide unified definitions, improve understanding and promote research in this field. Simple, reliable and nearly costless standardized methods of non-invasive measurement and monitoring of bladder pressure allow early recognition of IAH and timely optimized management. The correct, structured approach to treatment can have a striking effect and fully restore homeostasis. In recent years, significant progress has been made in this area with the contribution of surgeons, internal medicine specialists and anesthesiologists. Our review focuses on recent advances in order to present the complex underlying pathophysiology and guidelines concerning diagnosis, monitoring and treatment of this life-threatening condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.