ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2022
Clinical significance of aberrant left hepatic artery during gastrectomy: A systematic review.
Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complexity and heterogeneity of vascular anatomy in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- [Anatomical variations of vessels and bile ducts in hepatobiliary surgery : What must be considered in gallbladder and liver surgery?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVascular variations are frequently encountered during surgery. Approximately thirty percent of these variations are aberrant left hepatic arteries originating from the left gastric artery.
aimTo summarize the safety and feasibility of aberrant left hepatic arteries (ALHA) ligation in gastric cancer patients who underwent laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (LAG).
methodsThe literature search was systematically performed on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The publishing date of eligible studies was from inception to June 2021.
resultsA total of nine studies were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria in this review. The variation rate of ALHA ranged from 7.00% to 20.70%, and four studies compared the differences between the ALHA ligation group and the preservation group. Only one study showed worse postoperative outcomes in the ALHA ligation group. In all the included studies, a significant difference was found between the ALHA ligation group and the preservation group in terms of postoperative liver enzymes after LAG. However, there was no significant difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the two groups.
conclusionIn conclusion, it is not always safe and feasible for surgeons to ligate the ALHA during LAG surgery, and it is necessary for gastric cancer patients to undergo preoperative examination to clarify the ALHA subtypes, measure the diameter of the ALHA, and determine whether the patients have chronic liver disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.