Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35647044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Radiomics and Machine Learning for Detecting Scar Tissue on CT Delayed Enhancement Imaging.

Hugh O'Brien, Michelle C Williams, Ronak Rajani, Steven Niederer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hugh O'BrienSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle C WilliamsCentre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ronak RajaniSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Steven NiedererSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/ICRF/20/26002Wellcome Trust 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delayed enhancement CT (CT-DE) has been evaluated as a tool for the detection of myocardial scar and compares well to the gold standard of MRI with late gadolinium enhancement (MRI-LGE). Prior work has established that high performance can be achieved with manual reading; however, few studies have looked at quantitative measures to differentiate scar and healthy myocardium on CT-DE or automated analysis. Methods: Eighteen patients with clinically indicated MRI-LGE were recruited for CT-DE at multiple 80 and 100 kV post contrast imaging. Left ventricle segmentation was performed on both imaging modalities, along with scar segmentation on MRI-LGE. Segmentations were registered together and scar regions were estimated on CT-DE. 93 radiomic features were calculated and analysed for their ability to differentiate between scarred and non-scarred myocardium regions. Machine learning (ML) classifiers were trained using the strongest set of radiomic features to classify segments containing scar on CT-DE. Features and classifiers were compared across both tube voltages and combined-energy images. Results: There were 59 and 51 statistically significant features in the 80 and 100 kV images respectively. Combined-energy imaging increased this to 63 with more features having area under the curve (AUC) above 0.9. The 10 highest AUC features for each image were used in the ML classifiers. The 100 kV images produced the best ML classifier, a support vector machine with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.87-0.90). Comparable performance was achieved with both the 80 kV and combined-energy images. Conclusions: CT-DE can be quantitatively analyzed using radiomic feature calculations. These features may be suitable for ML classification techniques to prospectively identify AHA segments with performance comparable to previously reported manual reading. Future work on larger CT-DE datasets is warranted to establish optimum imaging parameters and features.

Indexed as

computed tomographydelayed enhancement cardiac computed tomographymachine learningradiomics analysisscar imaging

Identifiers

PMID35647044
PMCPMC9133416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.