ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Rupture Risk Assessment for Anterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms Using Decision Tree Modeling.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Middle Cerebral Artery Bifurcation Geometry and Aneurysm Formation: A Propensity Score-Matched 3D Rotational Morphometry Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model for predicting rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Neurosurgical review · 2026Review
- A Decision Tree Model to Help Treatment Decision-Making for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multi-center, Long-Term Follow-up Study in a Large Chinese Cohort.Translational stroke research · 2025Observational
- Rupture risk assessment for AComA aneurysms with morphological, hemodynamic and structural mechanical analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although anterior communicating artery (ACoA) aneurysms have a higher risk of rupture than aneurysms in other locations, whether to treat unruptured ACoA aneurysms incidentally found is a dilemma because of treatment-related complications. Machine learning models have been widely used in the prediction of clinical medicine. In this study, we aimed to develop an easy-to-use decision tree model to assess the rupture risk of ACoA aneurysms. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of rupture risk for patients with ACoA aneurysms from two medical centers. Morphologic parameters of these aneurysms were measured and evaluated. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to investigate the risk factors of aneurysm rupture. A decision tree model was developed to assess the rupture risk of ACoA aneurysms based on significant risk factors. Results: In this study, 285 patients were included, among which 67 had unruptured aneurysms and 218 had ruptured aneurysms. Aneurysm irregularity and vessel angle were independent predictors of rupture of ACoA aneurysms. There were five features, including size ratio, aneurysm irregularity, flow angle, vessel angle, and aneurysm size, selected for decision tree modeling. The model provided a visual representation of a decision tree and achieved a good prediction performance with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.864 in the training dataset and 0.787 in the test dataset. Conclusion: The decision tree model is a simple tool to assess the rupture risk of ACoA aneurysms and may be considered for treatment decision-making of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.