Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Clinical Relevance of the LVEDD and LVESD Trajectories in HF Patients With LVEF < 35.

Yu-Chen Chen, Shi-Chue Hsing, Yuan-Ping Chao, Yung-Wen Cheng, Chin-Sheng Lin, Chin Lin, Wen-Hui Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yu-Chen ChenDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shi-Chue HsingDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ping ChaoDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yung-Wen ChengDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin-Sheng LinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chin LinSchool of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Hui FangDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Certain variables reportedly are associated with a change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, literature describing the association between the recovery potential of LVEF and parameters of ventricular remodeling in echocardiography remains sparse. Methods: We recruited 2,148 HF patients with LVEF < 35%. All patients underwent at least two echocardiographic images. The study aimed to compare LVEF alterations and their association with patient characteristics and echocardiographic findings. Results: Patients with "recovery" of LVEF (follow-up LVEF ≥ 50%) were less likely to have prior myocardial infarction (MI), had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (Af), were less likely to have diabetes and hypertension, and had a smaller left atrium (LA) diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD), both in crude and in adjusted models (adjustment for age and sex). LVEDD cutoff values of 59.5 mm in men and 52.5 mm in women and LVESD cutoff values of 48.5 mm in men and 46.5 mm in women showed a year-to-year increase in the rate of recovery (follow-up LVEF ≥ 50%)/improvement (follow-up LVEF ≥ 35%), Conclusions: Our study shows that LVEDD and LVESD increments in echocardiography can be predictors of changes in LVEF in in HF patients with LVEF < 35%. They may be used to identify patients who require more aggressive therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

changes in ejection fractionejection fractionheart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)left ventricle end diastolic dimension (LVEDD)left ventricle end systolic dimension (LVESD)

Identifiers

PMID35646999
PMCPMC9136034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.