Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646983›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

METORY: Development of a Demand-Driven Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Platform Tailored for Clinical Trials.

Ki Young Huh, Sang-Un Jeong, Seol Ju Moon, Min-Ji Kim, Wooseok Yang, Myeonggyu Jeong, Ildae Song, Yong-Geun Kwak, SeungHwan Lee, Min-Gul Kim

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ki Young HuhDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Un JeongCenter for Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Seol Ju MoonCenter for Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Min-Ji KimCenter for Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Wooseok YangClinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Myeonggyu JeongClinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Ildae SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Kyungsung University, Busan, South Korea.
Yong-Geun KwakCenter for Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
SeungHwan LeeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Min-Gul KimCenter for Clinical Pharmacology and Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, South Korea.
Jeonbuk National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRKyungsung University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advent of the dynamic consent concept intensified the data integrity issue in clinical trials. Incorporating blockchain technology into a dynamic consent platform can be a feasible solution. Due to various clinical trial settings, a demand-driven development strategy is required. We developed a blockchain-based dynamic consent platform named METORY tailored for clinical trials. The platform consisted of three parts: web and mobile application user interface, study management platform, and blockchain platform. Hyperledger Fabric, an enterprise-grade private blockchain framework, was used to integrate blockchain into the study consent platform. We conducted user acceptance tests and applied feedback to the improvement of the platform. Identity and role-based access control was constructed by combining mobile-application-based certificate system and access control functionalities in Hyperledger fabric. Data were encrypted using SHA-256 prior to transmission to blockchain server and TLS protocol was used for in-transit encryption. File-system level encryption was separated implemented within the security measures from Amazon RDS. Users' experience in the clinical trial was acceptable in the ease and usefulness of the platform.

Indexed as

blockchainclinical trialsdynamic consentmobile applicationplatform

Identifiers

PMID35646983
PMCPMC9136007
OpenAlexW4280580078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.