Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646952›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

A Regulatory Risk-Based Approach to ATMP/CGT Development: Integrating Scientific Challenges With Current Regulatory Expectations.

Laura I Salazar-Fontana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Stem cells in organogenesis and regeneration.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Laura I Salazar-FontanaLAIZ Regulatory Science Consulting, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell and Gene Therapy Products (CGT), regulated as Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) in the European Union (EU), represent a novel and varied group of biotherapeutics developed to treat specific conditions for which there are limited or no effective treatments. The novelty and complexity of this product modality demands a regulatory risk-based approach to define a sound development plan, particularly, as most developers aim to target more than one market area simultaneously for clinical development and registration. This regulatory strategy should be built on solid scientific data that also addresses general regulatory recommendations to enable a benefit:risk analysis that is aligned with the particularities of each CGT product. This risk-based approach is especially helpful when no detailed product-specific regulatory guidelines are available. The goal of this article is to orient developers on how to build a combined EU/US regulatory strategy through the assessment of commonly understood quality (CMC), non-clinical, and clinical regulatory risks faced by ATMP/CGT.

Indexed as

advanced therapy medicinal productscell and gene therapy productscell therapyEMAFDAgene therapyregulatory riskregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID35646952
PMCPMC9139109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.