ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Liquid Biopsy in Colorectal Cancer: Quo Vadis? Implementation of Liquid Biopsies in Routine Clinical Patient Care in Two German Comprehensive Cancer Centers.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic Pathways and Molecular Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Perspectives in Poland.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- A scoping review of factors influencing the implementation of liquid biopsy for cancer care.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The use of liquid biopsies (LB) in patients with solid malignancies enables comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and has the potential to guide therapy stratification and support disease monitoring. To examine clinical uptake of LB in a real-world setting, LB implementation was analyzed at two German cancer centers (LMU Munich and Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin) between 2017 and 2021, with focus on colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, all patients who received a LB between January 2017 and December 2021 as part of routine clinical management were included. To provide adequate context, we collected disease characteristics and technical specifications of the LB methods applied. Additionally, we examined the concordance of Results: In total, our cohort included 86 CRC patients and 161 LB conducted in these patients between 2017 and 2021. In 59 patients, comparison between tissue-based and liquid-based molecular diagnostics, revealed a divergence in 23 (39%) of the evaluable samples. Conclusion: Our real-world data analysis indicates that the possibilities of LB are not yet exploited in everyday clinical practice. Currently, the variety of methods and lack of standardization, as well as restricted reimbursement for liquid based CGP hinder the use of LB in clinical routine. To overcome these issues, prospective clinical trials are needed to provide evidence driving the implementation of LB into the management of CRC patients and to support their implementation into clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.