Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35646613›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2022

Implementation of the World Health Organization Global Burn Registry: Lessons Learned.

Caitlin Hebron, Kajal Mehta, Barclay Stewart, Patricia Price, Tom Potokar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Effect of the Coexistence of Hair Follicle and Perforator Artery Density on Length of Hospital Stay in Burns.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlin HebronCentre for Global Burn Injury Policy and Research, Swansea University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-4301
Kajal MehtaDepartment of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-3493
Barclay StewartDivision of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8099-9218
Patricia PriceCentre for Global Burn Injury Policy and Research, Swansea University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3767-0131
Tom PotokarCentre for Global Burn Injury Policy and Research, Swansea University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9282-8128

Funding

Northern/Pacific Universities Global Health Research Training ConsortiumR25TW009345 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KOLARS, JOSEPH C., NERURKAR, VIVEK RAMCHANDRA · 2012 to 2016
$5.9M
Department of Health 16/137/110FIC NIH HHS R25 TW009345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn injuries are a major cause of death and disability globally; however, the true epidemiologic burden is underestimated given the limited and fragmented availability of high-quality burn injury data from many regions. To address this gap, the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Burn Registry (GBR)-a minimum dataset aligned with a centralized registry-was officially launched in 2018 to facilitate hospital-level collection of key prevention, care, and outcome data from burn-injured patients around the world in a standardized manner. However, uptake and use of GBR has been low and inconsistent. Therefore, we aimed to identify and understand the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the GBR to inform the development of a web-based GBR implementation guide through the

Indexed as

BurnsHumansQuality ImprovementRegistriesUnited KingdomWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID35646613
PMCPMC9122007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.